Cited by 170Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship

Kammer, Thomas·1998·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the visual cortex is known to induce phosphenes and is able to suppress visual perception. To address the topographic relationship of phosphenes and transient scotomas, the visual field of 10 normal subjects was investigated using a perimetric approach. The central visual field (diameter: 20 degrees) was tested at 32 sites. Perceptual thresholds were determined by presenting 1 ms test spots flashed with varying intensity in random order. TMS was applied with a focal figure-of-eight coil placed over the inion. All subjects perceived phosphenes, mostly restricted to one of the lower quadrants within the visual field. In 13 out of 15 investigations, a magnetic stimulus triggered 100 ms after the visual target resulted in a relative scotoma with threshold changes of 8 dB or more. In 9 of 13 investigations, scotomas coincided spatially with sketches of phosphenes made by subjects in a separate test. Scotomas covered only a small percentage of the total visual field, which may explain the failure of previous studies to find perceptual suppression with the focal coil. The present result demonstrates that phosphenes evoked during TMS can serve as a guide for optimal visual stimulus alignment in neuropsychological experiments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00093-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Amassian, 1989, Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 74, 458
  2. Ashbridge, 1997, Temporal aspects of visual-search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1121
  3. Barker, 1985, Magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Journal of Physiology (London), 369, 3
  4. Beckers, 1991, Impairment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 421
  5. Beckers, 1995, The consequences of inactivating areas V, 118, 49
  6. Cohen, 1990, Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 350
  7. Epstein, 1996, Magnetic coil suppression of visual perception at an extracalcarine site. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 13, 247
  8. Epstein, 1996, Magnetic coil suppression of extrafoveal visual perception using disappearance targets. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 13, 242
  9. Fahle, 1995, Fast perceptual learning in hyperacuity. Vision Research, 35, 3003
  10. Grafman, 1994, Induction of a recall deficit by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroreport, 5, 1157
  11. Heijl, 1975, An automatic static perimeter, 53, 293
  12. Hotson, 1994, Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination. Vision Research, 34, 2115
  13. Kammer, 1998, Are recognition deficits following occipital lobe TMS explained by raised detection thresholds? Neuropsychologia, 11, 1161
  14. Karni, 1993, The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature, 365, 250
  15. Kastner, 1998, Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the occipital lobe. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 19
  16. Masur, 1993, Suppression of visual perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation—experimental findings in healthy subjects and patients with optic neuritis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 86, 259
  17. Miller, 1996, Transcranial magnetic stimulation—delays in visual suppression due to luminance changes. Neuroreport, 7, 1740
  18. Müri, 1996, Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices during memory-guided saccades in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2102
  19. Oyachi, 1995, Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex degrades accuracy of memory-guided saccades in humans. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, 1441
  20. Pascual-Leone, 1994, Induction of visual extinction by rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe. Neurology, 44, 494
  21. Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J, Cohen LG, Roth BJ, Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new tool for the study of higher cognitive functions in humans. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 11, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997:267–290.
  22. Pascual-Leone, 1994, Induction of errors in a delayed response task by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroreport, 5, 2417
  23. Poggio, 1992, Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science, 256, 1018
  24. Roth, 1991, A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced in the cortex during magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 81, 47
  25. Stoerig, 1997, Blindsight in man and monkey. Brain, 120, 535

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kammer, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Kammer, Thomas
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
191-198
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1494786883
Cited by
170
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
phosphenes, transcranial magnetic stimulation, visual cortex, occipital lobe, visual field topography, perceptual suppression, visual perception, visual field testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetics, Male, Occipital Lobe, Phosphenes, Scotoma, Time Factors, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review