Cited by 21Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges

Open access
Penton, Tegan, Catmur, Caroline, Banissy, Michael J, Bird, Geoffrey, Walsh, Vincent·2022·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Use of non-invasive brain stimulation methods (NIBS) has become a common approach to study social processing in addition to behavioural, imaging and lesion studies. However, research using NIBS to investigate social processing faces challenges. Overcoming these is important to allow valid and reliable interpretation of findings in neurotypical cohorts, but also to allow us to tailor NIBS protocols to atypical groups with social difficulties. In this review, we consider the utility of brain stimulation as a technique to study and modulate social processing. We also discuss challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study social processing in neurotypical adults with a view to highlighting potential solutions. Finally, we discuss additional challenges that face researchers using NIBS to study and modulate social processing in atypical groups. These are important to consider given that NIBS protocols are rarely tailored to atypical groups before use. Instead, many rely on protocols designed for neurotypical adults despite differences in brain function that are likely to impact response to NIBS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsaa102

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-invasive neuromodulation strategies (rTMS and tDCS) currently only allow manipulation of relatively shallow cortical regions.

    “these methods currently only allow manipulation of relatively shallow cortical regions [183].”

    From Neural circuits regulating prosocial behaviors (2023) · cites this paper as [183]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penton, T., Catmur, C., Banissy, M. J., Bird, G., & Walsh, V.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Penton, Tegan
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2020-07-30
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
15-25
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W3046239930
Cited by
21
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Baily Thomas Charitable Trust
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/R007527/1)
  • Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2015-019)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M50175X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
non-invasive brain stimulation, social processing, social brain, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, neurotypical adults, methodological issues, social cognition
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review