Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses

SALAFIA, C, PEZZULLO, J, MINIOR, V, DIVON, M·1997·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify placental histopathology associated with absent and reversed end-diastolic flow demonstrated by umbilical artery (UA) Doppler velocimetry in fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: Between January 1989 and June 1995, 64 consecutive, nonanomalous singletons at less than the tenth percentile for birth weight were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, with UA Doppler velocimetry obtained within 3 days of delivery; 54 of the 64 (84%) had placental histopathology. Umbilical artery Doppler wave forms were classified as having end-diastolic flow (n = 26), and either absent (n = 20) or reversed end-diastolic flow (n = 8). Blinded review of placental histology scored lesions in categories of intraplacental vaso-occlusion, uteroplacental vascular pathology, chronic inflammation, and coagulation. RESULTS: Using cases of FGR with end-diastolic flow present as the control population, we found that absent end-diastolic flow cases had significantly more fetal stem vessels with medial hyperplasia and luminal obliteration, and cases of reversed end-diastolic flow had significantly more poorly vascularized terminal villi, villous stromal hemorrhage, "hemorrhagic endovasculitis," and abnormally thin-walled fetal stem vessels (each P < .005). CONCLUSION: In FGR, UA Doppler velocity wave forms do not demonstrate a continuum of placental lesions in which reversed end-diastolic flow reflects more severe placental histopathology than absent end-diastolic flow and end-diastolic flow present. As expected, absent end-diastolic flow cases had more occlusive lesions of the intraplacental vasculature. In reversed end-diastolic flow, lesions suggesting vascular remodeling and/or damage by pathologic conditions of intraplacental flow predominated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00473-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
SALAFIA, C., PEZZULLO, J., MINIOR, V, & DIVON, M.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
1997-11
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
830-836
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040012891
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00473-0
The paper
SALAFIA, C., PEZZULLO, J., MINIOR, V, & DIVON, M. (1997). Placental pathology of absent and reversed end-diastolic flow in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00473-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.