The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations, and reality
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype?
Gerlai, R. (1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)20020-7 · Cited by 881
Gärtner, K. (1990) · Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1258/002367790780890347 · Cited by 241 · cited 1×
“In my opinion, extreme homogeneity will not result from standardization, because we already know that individual anatomical, physiological, and behavioral variation usually exists within a highly inbred strain in the confines of a single lab, even when strenuous efforts are made to achieve a uniform environment [24].”
BackgroundBehavior and mutagenesis screens: The importance of baseline analysis of inbred strains
Tarantino, L. M., Gould, T. J., Druhan, J. P., & Bucan, M. (2000) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s003350010107 · Cited by 158
Schalomon, P. M., & Wahlsten, D. (2002) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00633-5 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00010.x · Cited by 3,132
Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?
Richter, S. H., Garner, J. P., & Würbel, H. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1312 · Cited by 422
Chesler, E. J., Wilson, S. G., Lariviere, W. R., Rodriguez-Zas, S. L., & Mogil, J. S. (2002) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00103-3 · Cited by 331
Schrijver, N. C. A., Bahr, N. I., Weiss, I. C., & Würbel, H. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00790-6 · Cited by 294
What's wrong with my mouse model?
Kalueff, A. V., Wheaton, M., & Murphy, D. L. (2007) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.01.023 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahlsten, D.
- Venue
- Physiology & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 695-704
- ISSN
- 0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091763576
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations, and reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00527-3
- The paper
- Wahlsten, D. (2001). Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: Reasons, recommendations, and reality. Physiology & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00527-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
