Cited by 289Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAquaculture disease management and microbiotaAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Replacement of fish meal in diets for Australian silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus: I. Digestibility of alternative ingredients

Allan, Geoff L., Parkinson, Scott, Booth, Mark A., Stone, David A.J., Rowland, Stuart J., Frances, Jane, Warner-Smith, Rebecca·2000·Aquaculture

Abstract

Apparent digestibility coefficients (ADCs) for dry matter, nitrogen, energy and individual amino acids for 29 commonly used feed ingredients were determined for silver perch, a native Australian freshwater species currently being cultured in Australia, Taiwan and China. ADCs were determined using faeces collected following settlement. Results from 11 experiments are reported. Each experiment included a reference diet and test diets, which were composed of 69.3% reference diet, 29.7% test ingredient and 1% chromic oxide (inert indicator). Ingredients tested included Australian, Danish and Peruvian fish meals, blood meal, meat and bone meals from beef and lamb, poultry meal, feather meal, soybean and canola meals (both expeller and solvent extracted for each), full fat soybeans, peanut meal, cottonseed meal, linola, two species of lupins, field peas, faba beans, chick peas, vetch, cow peas, wheat gluten, corn gluten meal, two cultivars of wheat, millrun and sorghum. ADCs for dry matter, energy and nitrogen were highest for fish meal, although several other ingredients, including some animal meals and gluten from wheat and corn, had similar ADCs for dry matter and energy. Digestible protein from these ingredients was in the range 52-86% compared with 63-69% for fish meals. Silver perch were capable of digesting protein very effectively in almost all ingredients tested. Amino acid availability reflected nitrogen digestibility except for Peruvian fish meal and the two meat and bone meals, for which the availability of some amino acids was lower, possibly indicating protein damage during processing. Oilseeds and legumes also tended to have lower ADCs for some amino acids (e.g., sulphur amino acids) than for other amino acids. Differences in ADCs for nitrogen and individual amino acids indicate the need for individual amino acid availability data. The data provided a useful starting point for least-cost formulation of diets for silver perch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00380-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allan, G. L., Parkinson, S., Booth, M. A., Stone, D. A. J., Rowland, S. J., Frances, J., & Warner-Smith, R.
Corresponding author
Allan, Geoff L.
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
186
Issue
3-4
Pages
293-310
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165111743
Cited by
289
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
silver perch, Bidyanus bidyanus, fish meal replacement, apparent digestibility coefficients, feed ingredients, amino acid digestibility, nitrogen digestibility, energy digestibility, protein digestibility, fish meal, blood meal, meat and bone meal, oilseed crops, Fabaceae, gluten, lupin, diet formulation, aquaculture feed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review