Cited by 332Motor Control and AdaptationEmbodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and Synchronization

What is optimal about motor control?

Open access
Friston, Karl·2011·Neuron

Abstract

This article poses a controversial question: is optimal control theory useful for understanding motor behavior or is it a misdirection? This question is becoming acute as people start to conflate internal models in motor control and perception (Poeppel et al., 2008; Hickok et al., 2011). However, the forward models in motor control are not the generative models used in perceptual inference. This Perspective tries to highlight the differences between internal models in motor control and perception and asks whether optimal control is the right way to think about things. The issues considered here may have broader implications for optimal decision theory and Bayesian approaches to learning and behavior in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.018

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From the point of view of Active Inference, the purpose of a peripheral reflex is to suppress proprioceptive or interoceptive prediction errors through closed loop control.

    “From the point of view of Active Inference, the purpose of a peripheral reflex is to suppress proprioceptive or interoceptive prediction errors through closed loop control (Friston, 2011).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Friston, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friston, K.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Friston, Karl
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
488-498
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998651249
Cited by
332
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
optimal control, motor control, internal models, forward model, perceptual inference, generative models, motor behavior, Bayesian learning, decision theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review