Cited by 79Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatments

Neurobiological basis of serotonin-dopamine antagonists in the treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

STEEVES, T, FOX, S·2008·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a heritable neuropsychiatric disorder that presents in childhood with a constellation of motor and non-motor symptoms. The defining feature of the disorder is the presence of brief, stereotyped, motor or vocal behaviours called tics. Although tics are themselves voluntary, they are typically performed secondary to involuntary sensory symptoms or irresistible urges. TS is therefore said to be a disorder of human volition that likely represents a general failure of inhibition. It shares many features with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and impulse control disorder with which it is also commonly associated. Much of the anatomic substrate for TS probably lies in the circuits that connect multiple areas of cortex with the basal ganglia and thalamus to subserve motivation, inhibition of behaviour, planning of motor acts and detection of threats. To date, pathological studies of TS have been very few and the number of subjects evaluated too small to reliably elucidate the nature and significance of several reported abnormalities. However, evidence derived from both pharmacological trials and selected functional imaging studies suggests that disturbances of the dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems play a key role in the pathogenesis of TS. At the same time, multiple studies have demonstrated reciprocal interactions between the serotonin and dopamine systems of the brain. This information, when placed in the context of the observed functional imaging abnormalities, may generate further insights into the pathophysiology of TS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)00924-2

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
STEEVES, T., & FOX, S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
FOX, S
ORCID
FOX, S
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2008
Volume
172
Pages
495-513
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1564685812
Cited by
79
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
21.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Tourette syndrome, tics, serotonin-dopamine interaction, basal ganglia, thalamus, impulse control disorders, pathophysiology, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Basal Ganglia, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dopamine, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Serotonin, Serotonin Antagonists, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review