Cited by 277T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyAdrenal Hormones and DisordersEstrogen and related hormone effects

Dehydroepiandrosterone enhances IL2 production and cytotoxic effector function of human T cells.

Open access
Suzuki, Tomoko, Suzuki, Noboru, Daynes, Raymond A., Engleman, Edgar G.·1991·Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology

Abstract

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is the most abundant adrenal steroid hormone in humans. Although it is well established that DHEA serves as an intermediate in sex steroid synthesis, recent studies in mice suggest that DHEA may also be a physiologic regulator of IL2 secretion. To explore the effect of DHEA on the human immune system, T lymphocytes from healthy adults were exposed to DHEA followed by stimulation with mitogens or antigen. Upon activation with a variety of stimuli, T cells pretreated with 10(-8) to 10(-11) M DHEA produced significantly greater amounts of IL2 and mediated more potent cytotoxicity than T cells activated in the absence of this steroid hormone. The peak effect of DHEA was observed at 10(-9) M, the concentration of hormone present in the blood of normal adults. In contrast to its effect on murine T cells, the IL2 enhancing effect of DHEA on human lymphocytes was limited to fresh CD4+ T cells and CD4+ clones; neither fresh CD8+ cells nor CD8+ clones were directly affected by DHEA treatment, although CD8+ cells stimulated in the presence of CD4+ cells and DHEA demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity. The enhancing effect of DHEA was also detected at the level of IL2 mRNA, suggesting that DHEA may act as a transcriptional enhancer of the IL2 gene in CD4+ T cells. These results corroborate and extend earlier studies in mice and suggest a physiologic role for DHEA in regulating the human immune response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-1229(05)80024-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suzuki, T., Suzuki, N., Daynes, R. A., & Engleman, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Engleman, Edgar G.
Venue
Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-11
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
202-211
ISSN
0090-1229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980941499
Cited by
277
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ai025922-05)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-24607)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI25922)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
dehydroepiandrosterone, interleukin-2, T cell activation, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, steroid hormones, T cell cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Dehydroepiandrosterone, Humans, Interleukin-2, RNA, Messenger, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic, CD4 Antigens, Interleukin-4, CD8 Antigens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review