The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critique of Fixed and Progressive Ratio Schedules Used to Examine the Neural Substrates of Drug Reinforcement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richardson, N. R., & Roberts, D. C. S. (1996) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(95)00153-0 · Cited by 1,358
Self-citationProgressive Ratio as a Measure of Reward Strength
Hodos, W. (1961) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.134.3483.943 · Cited by 1,147
Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey: A measure of psychological dependence
Deneau, G., Yanagita, T., & Seevers, M. H. (1969) · Psychopharmacologia · doi:10.1007/bf00405254 · Cited by 806
Roberts, D. C. S., Koob, G. F., Klonoff, P., & Fibiger, H. C. (1980) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(80)90166-5 · Cited by 730
Self-citationMethods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs
(1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4812-5 · Cited by 686
Markou, A., Weiss, F., Gold, L. H., Caine, S. B., Schulteis, G., & Koob, G. F. (1993) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244907 · Cited by 559
Yokel, R. A., & Wise, R. A. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114313 · Cited by 540
Postcocaine anhedonia. An animal model of cocaine withdrawal.
Markou, A., & Koob, G. F. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 505
Roberts, D. C. S., & Koob, G. F. (1982) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/0091-3057(82)90469-5 · Cited by 448
Self-citationThe estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats
Roberts, D. C. S., Bennett, S. A. L., & Vickers, G. J. (1989) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00451696 · Cited by 370
Self-citation
Cited by
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Scofield, M. D., Heinsbroek, J. A., Gipson, C. D., Kupchik, Y. M., Spencer, S., Smith, A. C. W., Roberts-Wolfe, D., & Kalivas, P. W. (2016) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.116.012484 · Cited by 598
Opioid modulation of taste hedonics within the ventral striatum
Kelley, A. E., Bakshi, V. P., Haber, S. N., Steininger, T. L., Will, M. J., & Zhang, M. (2002) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00751-5 · Cited by 526
Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking
Caggiula, A. R., Donny, E. C., White, A. R., Chaudhri, N., Booth, S., Gharib, M. A., Hoffman, A., Perkins, K. A., & Sved, A. F. (2001) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00676-1 · Cited by 428
Self‐administration of drugs in animals and humans as a model and an investigative tool
Panlilio, L. V., & Goldberg, S. R. (2007) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02011.x · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, J. M., & Roberts, D. C. S.
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 441-447
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101511505
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critique of Fixed and Progressive Ratio Schedules Used to Examine the Neural Substrates of Drug Reinforcement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00445-5
- The paper
- Arnold, J. M., & Roberts, D. C. S. (1997). A Critique of Fixed and Progressive Ratio Schedules Used to Examine the Neural Substrates of Drug Reinforcement. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00445-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
