Cited by 830Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsInfection Control in HealthcareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries

Zaidi, Anita KM, Huskins, W Charles, Thaver, Durrane, Bhutta, Zulfiqar A, Abbas, Zohair, Goldmann, Donald A·2005·The Lancet

Abstract

Hospital-born babies in developing countries are at increased risk of neonatal infections because of poor intrapartum and postnatal infection-control practices. We reviewed data from developing countries on rates of neonatal infections among hospital-born babies, range of pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, and infection-control interventions. Reported rates of neonatal infections were 3-20 times higher than those reported for hospital-born babies in industrialised countries. Klebsiella pneumoniae, other gram-negative rods (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp, Acinetobacter spp), and Staphylococcus aureus were the major pathogens among 11,471 bloodstream isolates reported. These infections can often present soon after birth. About 70% would not be covered by an empiric regimen of ampicillin and gentamicin, and many might be untreatable in resource-constrained environments. The associated morbidity, mortality, costs, and adverse effect on future health-seeking behaviour by communities pose barriers to improvement of neonatal outcomes in developing countries. Low-cost, "bundled" interventions using systems quality improvement approaches for improved infection control are possible, but should be supported by evidence in developing country settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71881-x

Cites

181 of 181 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hospital-born babies in developing countries have a 3 to 20 times greater risk of neonatal infections because of poor infection-control practices.

    “However, even hospital-born babies in developing countries have a three times greater to 20 times greater risk of neonatal infections because of poor infection-control practices.56, 57, 58, 59”

    From Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea (2013) · cites this paper as [56]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaidi, A. K., Huskins, W. C., Thaver, D., Bhutta, Z. A., Abbas, Z., & Goldmann, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Zaidi, Anita KM
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
365
Issue
9465
Pages
1175-1188
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2168581177
Cited by
830
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
neonatal infection, nosocomial infections, neonatal sepsis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Gram-negative bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial resistance, infection control, developing countries, empirical antibiotic therapy, quality improvement intervention, neonatal mortality
MeSH terms
Cross Infection, Developing Countries, Humans, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Klebsiella Infections, Risk Factors, Incidence, Infection Control, Sepsis, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review