Cited by 213Muscle metabolism and nutritionAcute Kidney Injury ResearchDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Renal dysfunction accompanying oral creatine supplements

Pritchard, NR, Kalra, PA·1998·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79319-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few case studies reported that individuals purportedly taking creatine with or without other supplements presented with high creatinine levels and/or renal dysfunction.

    “With regard to the question of whether creatine has effect on renal function, a few case studies [249–252] reported that individuals purportedly taking creatine with or without other supplements presented with high creatinine levels and/or renal dysfunction [249–251].”
  • In that 1998 case study, based on increased blood levels of creatinine and subsequent estimate of calculated creatinine clearance, the patient's kidney health was presumed to be deteriorating, although he was otherwise in good health.

    “Based on increased blood levels of creatinine and subsequent estimate of calculated creatinine clearance, his kidney health was presumed to be deteriorating, although he was otherwise in good health.”
  • In 1998, a case study reported a young male with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and relapsing nephrotic syndrome who had recently begun ingesting creatine supplementation at 15 g/day for 7 days followed by 2 g/day for 7 weeks.

    “In 1998, a case study of a young male with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and relapsing nephrotic syndrome was reported [51]. The young male, who had kidney disease for 8 years and was treated with cyclosporine (i.e., immunosuppressant) for 5 years, had recently begun ingesting creatine supplementation (15 g/day for 7 days; followed by 2 g/day for 7 weeks).”
  • A few case study reports appeared in the literature suggesting adverse events despite other mitigating factors unrelated to creatine supplementation, which subsequently have been debunked.

    “A few case study reports also appeared in the literature suggesting adverse events despite other mitigating factors unrelated to creatine supplementation [52–54] which subsequently have been debunked [15,55,56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pritchard, N., & Kalra, P.
Affiliations
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-04
Volume
351
Issue
9111
Pages
1252-1253
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1973648573
Cited by
213
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
creatine supplementation, renal dysfunction, creatine loading, serum creatinine, exercise performance, dietary supplements, drug safety
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Creatine, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Male, Nephrotic Syndrome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review