Cited by 40Muscle metabolism and nutritionBiochemical effects in animalsMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Side Effects of Creatine Supplementation in Athletes

Open access
Francaux, Marc, Poortmans, Jacques R.·2006·International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Abstract

Context: Allegations about side effects of creatine supplementation by athletes have been published in the popular media and scientific publications. Purpose: To examine the experimental evidence relating to the physiological effects of creatine supplementation. Results: One of the purported effects of oral creatine supplementation is increased muscle mass. A review of the literature reveals a 1.0% to 2.3% increase in body mass, which is attributed to fat-free mass and, more specifically, to skeletal-muscle mass. Although it is unlikely that water retention can completely explain these changes, increase in muscle-protein synthesis has never been observed after creatine supplementation. Indirect evidence based on mRNA analyses suggests that transcription of certain genes is enhanced. Although the effect of creatine on muscle-protein synthesis seems irrefutable according to advertising, this allegation remains under debate in the scientific literature. The kidneys appear to maintain their functionality in healthy subjects who supplement with creatine, even over several months. Conclusion: The authors, however, think that creatine supplementation should not be used by an individual with preexisting renal disease and that risk should be evaluated before and during any supplementation period. Even if there is a slight increase in mutagenic agents (methylamine and formaldehyde) in urine after a heavy load of creatine (20 g/day), their excretion remains within a normal range. No data are currently available regarding the potential production of heterocyclic amines with creatine supplementation. In summary, the major risk for health is probably associated with the purity of commercially available creatine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/ijspp.1.4.311

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Francaux, M., & Poortmans, J. R.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Published
2006-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
311-323
ISSN
  • 1555-0265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-0273
OpenAlex
W2170564578
Cited by
40
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
creatine supplementation, athletes, adverse effects, muscle mass, fat-free mass, water retention, muscle protein synthesis, gene transcription, renal function, kidney disease, mutagenic compounds, heterocyclic amines
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Creatine, Drug Contamination, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Muscle, Skeletal, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Development, Athletic Performance, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review