CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 613Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial

Burns, Tom, Catty, Jocelyn, Becker, Thomas, Drake, Robert E, Fioritti, Angelo, Knapp, Martin, Lauber, Christoph, Rössler, Wulf, Tomov, Toma, van Busschbach, Jooske, White, Sarah, Wiersma, Durk·2007·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61516-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The value of the individual placement and support (IPS) programme in helping people with severe mental illness gain open employment is unknown in Europe. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of IPS, and to examine whether its effect is modified by local labour markets and welfare systems.Methods 312 patients with severe mental illness were randomly assigned in six European centres to receive IPS (n=156) or vocational services (n=156). Patients were followed up for 18 months. The primary outcome was the difference between the proportions of people entering competitive employment in the two groups. The heterogeneity of IPS effectiveness was explored with prospective meta-analyses to establish the effect of local welfare systems and labour markets. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the number NCT00461318.Findings IPS was more effective than vocational services for every vocational outcome, with 85 (55%) patients assigned to IPS working for at least 1 day compared with 43 (28%) patients assigned to vocational services (difference 26.9%, 95% CI 16.4-37.4). Patients assigned to vocational services were significantly more likely to drop out of the service and to be readmitted to hospital than were those assigned to IPS (drop-out 70 [45%] vs 20 [13%]; difference -32.1% [95% CI -41.5 to -22.7]; readmission 42 [31%] vs 28 [20%]; difference -11.2% [-21.5 to -0.90]). Local unemployment rates accounted for a substantial amount of the heterogeneity in IPS effectiveness.Interpretation Our demonstration of the effectiveness of IPS in widely differing labour market and welfare contexts confirms this service to be an effective approach for vocational rehabilitation in mental health that deserves investment and further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61516-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bond, 1997, A fidelity scale for the Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment, Rehabil Counsel Bull, 40, 265

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 609

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Burns, T., Catty, J., Becker, T., Drake, R. E., Fioritti, A., Knapp, M., Lauber, C., Rössler, W., Tomov, T., van Busschbach, J., White, S., & Wiersma, D.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Burns, Tom
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
370
Issue
9593
Pages
1146-1152
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61516-5
OpenAlex
W2128678354
Cited by
613
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 44
FWCI
111.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
supported employment, Individual Placement and Support, severe mental illness, vocational rehabilitation, competitive employment, vocational services, local labor markets, welfare system, unemployment, service dropout, hospital readmission, treatment effect heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Europe, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Program Evaluation, Logistic Models, Employment, Supported

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review