Cited by 31Medical Practices and RehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-beingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Effectiveness of two vocational rehabilitation programmes in women with long-term sick leave due to pain syndrome or mental illness: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Lytsy, P, Carlsson, L, Anderzén, I·2017·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mental illness and chronic pain are common reasons for long-term sick leave, typically more so for women. This study investigated the effects on return to work of 2 vocational rehabilitation programmes. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, 308 women were allocated to treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy, to multidisciplinary assessment and individualized rehabilitation interventions, or to a control group. Return-to-work at 12 months was assessed as: (i) returning to health insurance; (ii) number of reimbursed health insurance days during follow-up; (iii) self-reported change in working hours; (iv) a composite measure of self-reported change in work-related engagement. RESULTS: The mean age of the Swedish study population was 48.5 years (standard deviation (SD) 6.3 years) and the mean time on sick leave 7.5 years (SD 3.2 years). There were no significant differences in reimbursed days or returning to the health insurance at 12 months. The multidisciplinary assessment and individualized rehabilitation interventions group, compared with control, reported a significant increase in working hours per week, as well as a significant increase in work-related engagement. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary assessments and individual rehabilitation interventions may improve the chance of return-to-work in women with long-term sick leave due to pain condition or mental illness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/16501977-2188

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. RocheLeboucher G, PetitLemanac'h A, Bontoux L, Effectiveness of two vocational rehabilitation programmes DubusBausiere V, ParotShinkel E, Fanello S, et al. Multidisciplinary intensive functional restoration versus outpatient active physiotherapy in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 2235-2242.
  2. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDITC): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Internal Med 1998; 158: 1789-1795.
  3. Marnetoft SU, Selander J. Longterm effects of early versus delayed vocational rehabilitation -a fouryear followup. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 741-745.
  4. Salmi P, Svedberg P, Hagberg J, Lundh G, Linder J, Alex anderson K. Outcome of multidisciplinary investigations of longterm sickness absentees. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 131-137.
  5. SBU [Rehabilitation in chronic pain A systematic review] No. 198. Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering; 2010. Available from: http://www.sbu.se/contentas sets/f0f1e57fb7b14f1fbdd18382eeda7ab0/rehab_smar ta_2010_fulltext.pdf (in Swedish).
  6. Hoffmann H, Jackel D, Glauser S, Mueser KT, Kupper Z. Longterm effectiveness of supported employment: 5year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 2014, 171: 1183-1190.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lytsy, P., Carlsson, L., & Anderzén, I.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lytsy, P
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2017
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
170-177
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579720133
Cited by
31
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Vårdalstiftelsen
  • Socialdepartementet
  • Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
vocational rehabilitation, long-term sick leave, women, chronic pain, mental illness, return to work, acceptance and commitment therapy, multidisciplinary assessment, working hours
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Long-Term Care, Middle Aged, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Time Factors, Sick Leave, Chronic Pain, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review