Cited by 326Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Multimorbidity: redesigning health care for people who use it

Salisbury, Chris·2012·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60482-6

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salisbury, C.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Salisbury, Chris
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
380
Issue
9836
Pages
7-9
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2056096736
Cited by
326
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
multimorbidity, chronic disease, primary care, continuity of care, socioeconomic deprivation, age and sex differences, health care redesign, individualized care
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review