Cited by 130Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

The UK Biobank and selection bias

Open access
Swanson, James M·2012·The Lancet

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61179-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection bias is a common type of bias in large biobank studies, and has been reported as a problem, for example, in the UK Biobank.

    “In particular, selection bias is a common type of bias in large biobank studies, and has been reported as a problem, for example, in the UK Biobank 158”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [158]

    In “The UK Biobank and selection bias,” Swanson says the UK Biobank’s low response rate left it subject to selection bias. The passage supports the UK Biobank example, but does not establish that selection bias is common across large biobank studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harrington A. The fall of the schizophrenogenic mother. Lancet 2012; 379: 1292-93.
  2. Gerber P, Coff man K. Non-accidental head trauma in infants. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 499-507.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, James M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
380
Issue
9837
Pages
110
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2019221205
Cited by
130
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
UK Biobank, selection bias, sample selection bias, response rate, comorbidities, spurious association, model misspecification, generalizability
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, National Health Programs, Biological Specimen Banks, Databases as Topic, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review