Cited by 89Ethics in Clinical ResearchHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The limitations of large-scale volunteer databases to address inequalities and global challenges in health and aging

Open access
Brayne, Carol, Moffitt, Terrie E.·2022·Nature Aging

Abstract

Large-scale volunteer databanks (LSVD) have emerged from the recognized value of cohorts, attracting substantial funding and promising great scientific value. A major focus is their size, with the implicit and sometimes explicit assumption that large size (thus power) creates generalizability. We contend that this is open to challenge. In the context of aging and age-related disease research, LSVD typically have limitations such as healthy volunteer, white ethnicity and high-education biases, and they omit early and late life stages critical for understanding aging. Their outputs are heavily focused on biomedical pathways of single chronic diseases. LSVD outputs increasingly dominate the funding and the publication landscapes. This Perspective discusses LSVD limitations and calls for more transparent reporting in LSVD research, as well as a greater reflection on the value of LSVD in relation to resources consumed. We invite funders and researchers to examine whether LSVD do actually contribute knowledge needed for our acute global health challenges including inequalities. Carol Brayne and Terrie Moffit discuss the limitations of large-scale volunteer databanks (LSVD) for understanding aging and disease, call for further evaluation of their value and offer their thoughts on how to make the reporting of LSVD studies more transparent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-022-00277-x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many 'big data' sources from volunteers by their nature exclude those most at risk.

    “Many 'big data' sources from volunteers by their nature exclude those most at risk.(32)”
  • We used worldwide figures of prevalence where possible, which include disproportionate numbers from HICs.

    “We used worldwide figures of prevalence where possible, which include disproportionate numbers from HICs although we have included evidence that risk factors prevalence varies between countries.(32) (33)”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The section ‘Estimation of disease occurrence and risk’ cautions that volunteer databases are unsuitable for estimating population prevalence, but it does not describe the country composition of worldwide prevalence figures. Searches for high-income-country overrepresentation in global prevalence data found no passage addressing that point. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [61]Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brayne, C., & Moffitt, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Brayne, Carol
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2022-09-13
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
775-783
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295419447
Cited by
89
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Society
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P005918, P005918, MR/P005918/1, AG032282, P005918/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG069939, R01AG032282, R01AG073207)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD065563)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
aging research, age-related diseases, health disparities, generalizability, life course, research funding, research transparency, reporting quality
MeSH terms
Aging, Humans, Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review