Cited by 304Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Dilemmas in the diagnosis of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis

Brouwer, Matthijs C, Thwaites, Guy E, Tunkel, Allan R, van de Beek, Diederik·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Rapid diagnosis and treatment of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis reduces mortality and neurological sequelae, but can be delayed by atypical presentation, assessment of lumbar puncture safety, and poor sensitivity of standard diagnostic microbiology. Thus, diagnostic dilemmas are common in patients with suspected acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis. History and physical examination alone are sometimes not sufficient to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. Lumbar puncture is an essential investigation, but can be delayed by brain imaging. Results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination should be interpreted carefully, because CSF abnormalities vary according to the cause, patient's age and immune status, and previous treatment. Diagnostic prediction models that use a combination of clinical findings, with or without test results, can help to distinguish acute bacterial meningitis from other causes, but these models are not infallible. We review the dilemmas in the diagnosis of acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis, and focus on the roles of clinical assessment and CSF examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61185-4

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical presentation can vary significantly from one patient to another, can be difficult to assess objectively, and may even be absent in some cases.

    “Clinical data, such as headaches, photophobia, phonophobia, fever, or neck stiffness, were not collected for several reasons: (i) the clinical presentation can vary significantly from one patient to another, can be difficult to assess objectively, and may even be absent in some cases (19), (ii)”
  • Kernig's and Brudzinski's signs are often cited but their sensitivity can be as low as 5%.

    “Kernig's and Brudzinski's signs are often cited but their sensitivity can be as low as 5%.33”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brouwer, M. C., Thwaites, G. E., Tunkel, A. R., & van de Beek, D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Monmouth Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
380
Issue
9854
Pages
1684-1692
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2131707675
Cited by
302
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
community-acquired bacterial meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, diagnostic prediction model, atypical presentation, clinical evaluation, neuroimaging, diagnostic sensitivity
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Decision Support Techniques, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Medical History Taking, Physical Examination, Spinal Puncture, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Biomarkers, Meningitis, Bacterial, Community-Acquired Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review