Cited by 494Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsNutrition and Health in Aging

What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE-P study)

Open access
Kwon, S., Perera, S., Pahor, M., Katula, J.A., King, A.C., Groessl, E.J., Studenski, S.A.·2009·The Journal of nutrition, health and aging

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Performance measures provide important information, but the meaning of change in these measures is not well known. The purpose of this research is to 1) examine the effect of treatment assignment on the relationship between self-report and performance; 2) to estimate the magnitude of meaningful change in 400-meter walk time (400MWT), 4-meter gait speed (4MGS), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and 3) to evaluate the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from the LIFE-P study, a single blinded randomized clinical trial. Using change over one year, we applied distribution-based and anchor-based methods for self-reported mobility to estimate minimally important and substantial change in 400MWT, 4MGS and SPPB. SETTING: Four university-based clinical research sites. PARTICIPANTS: Sedentary adults aged 70-89 whose SPPB scores were less than 10 and who were able to complete a 400MW at baseline (n=424). INTERVENTIONS: A structured exercise program versus health education. MEASUREMENTS: 400MWT, 4MGS, SPPB. RESULTS: Relationships between self-report and performance measures were consistent between treatment arms. Minimally significant change estimates were 400MWT: 20-30 seconds, 4MGS: 0.03-0.05m/s and SPPB: 0.3 - 0.8 points. Substantial changes were 400MWT: 50-60 seconds, 4MGS: 0.08m/s, SPPB: 0.4 - 1.5 points. Magnitudes of change for improvement and decline were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of clinically important change in physical performance measures is reasonably consistent using several analytic techniques and appears to be achievable in clinical trials of exercise. Due to limited power, the effect of direction of change on estimates of magnitude remains uncertain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12603-009-0104-z

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwon, S., Perera, S., Pahor, M., Katula, J. A., King, A. C., Groessl, E. J., & Studenski, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kwon, S.
Venue
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
538-544
ISSN
1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073862763
Cited by
494
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
FWCI
40.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (58‐1950‐4‐401)
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Yale University
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Wake Forest University (P30 AG21332, 1P30AG21332, P30 AG024827)
  • University of Pittsburgh (P30-AG024827)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000064, 58-1950-4-401, #UO1 AG22376, AG024827, AG028740, 1 P30 AG21332)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
  • National Institute on Aging (1-P30-AG21332, U01AG22376, U01AG022376, K24AG021507, AG 024827, UO1 AG22376, AG028740, AG22376, P30AG-21332, P30AG024827, P30AG028740, P30AG021332)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029890)
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
minimally important change, substantial change, physical performance, older adults, sedentary older adults, walking speed, Short Physical Performance Battery, self-reported mobility, direction of change, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Health Education, Humans, Physical Fitness, Research Design, Self Disclosure, Single-Blind Method, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review