Cited by 939Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking

Open access
Roberto, Christina A, Swinburn, Boyd, Hawkes, Corinna, Huang, Terry T-K, Costa, Sergio A, Ashe, Marice, Zwicker, Lindsey, Cawley, John H +1 more·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

Despite isolated areas of improvement, no country to date has reversed its obesity epidemic. Governments, together with a broad range of stakeholders, need to act urgently to decrease the prevalence of obesity. In this Series paper, we review several regulatory and non-regulatory actions taken around the world to address obesity and discuss some of the reasons for the scarce and fitful progress. Additionally, we preview the papers in this Lancet Series, which each identify high-priority actions on key obesity issues and challenge some of the entrenched dichotomies that dominate the thinking about obesity and its solutions. Although obesity is acknowledged as a complex issue, many debates about its causes and solutions are centred around overly simple dichotomies that present seemingly competing perspectives. Examples of such dichotomies explored in this Series include personal versus collective responsibilities for actions, supply versus demand-type explanations for consumption of unhealthy food, government regulation versus industry self-regulation, top-down versus bottom-up drivers for change, treatment versus prevention priorities, and a focus on undernutrition versus overnutrition. We also explore the dichotomy of individual versus environmental drivers of obesity and conclude that people bear some personal responsibility for their health, but environmental factors can readily support or undermine the ability of people to act in their own self-interest. We propose a refra…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61744-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberto, C. A., Swinburn, B., Hawkes, C., Huang, T. T.-K., Costa, S. A., Ashe, M., Zwicker, L., Cawley, J. H., & Brownell, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • World Cancer Research Fund International (GB)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • ChangeLab Solutions (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberto, Christina A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
385
Issue
9985
Pages
2400-2409
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2140173726
Cited by
939
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 46
FWCI
20.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • World Cancer Research Fund International
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity prevention, obesity epidemic, food environment, food regulation, unhealthy food consumption, personal responsibility, collective responsibility, barriers to prevention, environmental determinants of health
MeSH terms
Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Food Services, Health Policy, Health Priorities, Health Promotion, Humans, Obesity, Policy Making, Schools, Global Health, Food Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review