Cited by 87Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Sustained-release dexamfetamine in the treatment of chronic cocaine-dependent patients on heroin-assisted treatment: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Nuijten, Mascha, Blanken, Peter, van de Wetering, Ben, Nuijen, Bastiaan, van den Brink, Wim, Hendriks, Vincent M·2016·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Heroin-assisted treatment is effective for methadone treatment-refractory heroin-dependent patients, but continued comorbid cocaine dependence remains problematic. Sustained-release dexamfetamine is a promising agonist pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence and we aimed to assess its acceptance, efficacy, and safety. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients who were treatment-refractory, as indicated by at least two earlier failed treatments aimed at reducing or abstaining from cocaine use, and who regularly (≥8 days/month) used crack-cocaine were enrolled from four heroin-assisted treatment centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 12 weeks of daily, supervised prescription of 60 mg/day oral sustained-release dexamfetamine or placebo in addition to co-prescribed methadone and diacetylmorphine. Randomisation was done by the collaborating pharmacist, using a computer-generated random number sequence with stratification by treatment centre in blocks of four per stratum. Randomisation was masked to patients, staff, and researchers throughout the study. The primary outcome was the number of self-reported days of cocaine use during study treatment, assessed every 4 weeks. Primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EUdraCT 2013-004024-11) and with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00205-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuijten, M., Blanken, P., van de Wetering, B., Nuijen, B., van den Brink, W., & Hendriks, V. M.
Affiliations
  • Parnassia Groep (NL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Nuijten, Mascha
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
387
Issue
10034
Pages
2226-2234
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2305718570
Cited by
87
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
d-amphetamine, sustained-release formulation, cocaine dependence, heroin-assisted treatment, methadone, heroin, dual diagnosis, adverse events, opioid substitution therapy, crack cocaine, substance use comorbidity, harm reduction
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Chronic Disease, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heroin Dependence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Crack Cocaine, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review