Cited by 14Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

Happiness, health, and mortality

Open access
Kubzansky, Laura D, Kim, Eric S, Salinas, Joel, Huffman, Jeff C, Kawachi, Ichiro·2016·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30896-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubzansky, L. D., Kim, E. S., Salinas, J., Huffman, J. C., & Kawachi, I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kubzansky, Laura D
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
388
Issue
10039
Pages
27
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2462342413
Cited by
14
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
happiness, life expectancy, mortality, self-rated health, overadjustment, subjective well-being, longevity, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Happiness, Humans, Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review