Cited by 246Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth, psychology, and well-being

Well-being measurement and the WHO health policy Health 2010: systematic review of measurement scales

Open access
Lindert, Jutta, Bain, Paul A., Kubzansky, Laura D., Stein, Claudia·2015·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective well-being (SWB) contributes to health and mental health. It is a major objective of the new World Health Organization health policy framework, 'Health 2020'. Various approaches to defining and measuring well-being exist. We aimed to identify, map and analyse the contents of self-reported well-being measurement scales for use with individuals more than 15 years of age to help researchers and politicians choose appropriate measurement tools. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed for studies published between 2007 and 2012, with additional hand-searching, to identify empirical studies that investigated well-being using a measurement scale. For each eligible study, we identified the measurement tool and reviewed its components, number of items, administration time, validity, reliability, responsiveness and sensitivity. RESULTS: The literature review identified 60 unique measurement scales. Measurement scales were either multidimensional (n = 33) or unidimensional (n = 14) and assessed multiple domains. The most frequently encountered domains were affects (39 scales), social relations (17 scales), life satisfaction (13 scales), physical health (13 scales), meaning/achievement (9 scales) and spirituality (6 scales). The scales included between 1 and 100 items; the administration time varied from 1 to 15 min. CONCLUSIONS: Well-being is a higher order construct. Measures seldom reported testing for gender or cultural sensitivity. The content and format of scales varied considerably. Effective monitoring and comparison of SWB over time and across geographic regions will require further work to refine definitions of SWB. We recommend concurrent evaluation of at least three self-reported SWB measurement scales, including evaluation for gender or cultural sensitivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/cku193

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. WHO European Ministerial Conference on Mental Health. Mental Health Action Plan for Europe. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
  2. 10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.678 · DOI
  4. Maslow AH . Toward a Psycholgy of Being. 3rd edn. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons; 1999.
  5. Frankl VE . The spiritual dimension in existential analysis and logotherapy. J Individ Psychol 1959;15:157-65.
  6. 10.1037//0022-3514.76.4.662 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Perrin E . Med Outcomes Trust Bull. 1995; IV. SAC instrument review process.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindert, J., Bain, P. A., Kubzansky, L. D., & Stein, C.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-01-22
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
731-740
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2160933378
Cited by
246
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
subjective well-being, self-report measures, health policy, life satisfaction, affect, interpersonal relationships, spirituality, scale reliability and validity, intercultural sensitivity, gender sensitivity
MeSH terms
Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mental Health, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, World Health Organization, Reproducibility of Results, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review