Cited by 514Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Conventional and genetic evidence on alcohol and vascular disease aetiology: a prospective study of 500 000 men and women in China

Open access
Millwood, Iona Y, Walters, Robin G, Mei, Xue W, Guo, Yu, Yang, Ling, Bian, Zheng, Bennett, Derrick A, Chen, Yiping +13 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Moderate alcohol intake has been associated with reduced cardiovascular risk in many studies, in comparison with abstinence or with heavier drinking. Studies in east Asia can help determine whether these associations are causal, since two common genetic variants greatly affect alcohol drinking patterns. We used these two variants to assess the relationships between cardiovascular risk and genotype-predicted mean alcohol intake in men, contrasting the findings in men with those in women (few of whom drink). METHODS: The prospective China Kadoorie Biobank enrolled 512 715 adults between June 25, 2004, and July 15, 2008, from ten areas of China, recording alcohol use and other characteristics. It followed them for about 10 years (until Jan 1, 2017), monitoring cardiovascular disease (including ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage, and myocardial infarction) by linkage with morbidity and mortality registries and electronic hospital records. 161 498 participants were genotyped for two variants that alter alcohol metabolism, ALDH2-rs671 and ADH1B-rs1229984. Adjusted Cox regression was used to obtain the relative risks associating disease incidence with self-reported drinking patterns (conventional epidemiology) or with genotype-predicted mean male alcohol intake (genetic epidemiology-ie, Mendelian randomisation), with stratification by study area to control for variation between areas in disease rates and in genotype-predicted intake. FINDINGS: 33% (69 897/210 205) of men reported drinking alcohol in most weeks, mainly as spirits, compared with only 2% (6245/302 510) of women. Among men, conventional epidemiology showed that self-reported alcohol intake had U-shaped associations with the incidence of ischaemic stroke (n=14 930), intracerebral haemorrhage (n=3496), and acute myocardial infarction (n=2958); men who reported drinking about 100 g of alcohol per week (one to two drinks per day) had lower risks of all three diseases than non-drinkers or heavier drinkers. In contrast, although genotype-predicted mean male alcohol intake varied widely (from 4 to 256 g per week-ie, near zero to about four drinks per day), it did not have any U-shaped associations with risk. For stroke, genotype-predicted mean alcohol intake had a continuously positive log-linear association with risk, which was stronger for intracerebral haemorrhage (relative risk [RR] per 280 g per week 1·58, 95% CI 1·36-1·84, p<0·0001) than for ischaemic stroke (1·27, 1·13-1·43, p=0·0001). For myocardial infarction, however, genotype-predicted mean alcohol intake was not significantly associated with risk (RR per 280 g per week 0·96, 95% CI 0·78-1·18, p=0·69). Usual alcohol intake in current drinkers and genotype-predicted alcohol intake in all men had similarly strong positive associations with systolic blood pressure (each p<0·0001). Among women, few drank and the studied genotypes did not predict high mean alcohol intake and were not positively associated with blood pressure, stroke, or myocardial infarction. INTERPRETATION: Genetic epidemiology shows that the apparently protective effects of moderate alcohol intake against stroke are largely non-causal. Alcohol consumption uniformly increases blood pressure and stroke risk, and appears in this one study to have little net effect on the risk of myocardial infarction. FUNDING: Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology, Kadoorie Charitable Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, GlaxoSmithKline, Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31772-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millwood, I. Y., Walters, R. G., Mei, X. W., Guo, Y., Yang, L., Bian, Z., Bennett, D. A., Chen, Y., Dong, C., Hu, R., Zhou, G., Yu, B., Jia, W., Parish, S., Clarke, R., Davey Smith, G., Collins, R., Holmes, M. V., Li, L., Peto, R., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Liming
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
393
Issue
10183
Pages
1831-1842
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2928401928
Cited by
514
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 40
FWCI
45.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • UK Wellcome Trust (212946/Z/18/Z, 202922/Z/16/Z, 104085/Z/14/Z, 088158/Z/09/Z)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81390540, 81390541, 81390544)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC 0900500, 0900501, 0900504, 1303904)
  • GlaxoSmithKline and the UK Medical Research Council (MC-PC-13049, MC-PC-14135)
  • UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/1)
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/18/23/33512)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
alcohol consumption, cardiovascular disease, ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute myocardial infarction, ALDH2 rs671, alcohol metabolism genes, Mendelian randomization, sex differences, U-shaped relationship, China Kadoorie Biobank
MeSH terms
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Mitochondrial, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Dehydrogenase, Alcohol Drinking, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebral Hemorrhage, China, Asia, Eastern, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Incidence, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review