Cited by 883Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Use of aspirin to reduce risk of initial vascular events in patients at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease (ARRIVE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Gaziano, J Michael, Brotons, Carlos, Coppolecchia, Rosa, Cricelli, Claudio, Darius, Harald, Gorelick, Philip B, Howard, George, Pearson, Thomas A +4 more·2018·The Lancet

Abstract

Background The use of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events remains controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of aspirin versus placebo in patients with a moderate estimated risk of a first cardiovascular event. Methods ARRIVE is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study done in seven countries. Eligible patients were aged 55 years (men) or 60 years (women) and older and had an average cardiovascular risk, deemed to be moderate on the basis of the number of specific risk factors. We excluded patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or other bleeding, or diabetes. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation code to receive enteric-coated aspirin tablets (100 mg) or placebo tablets, once daily. Patients, investigators, and others involved in treatment or data analysis were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite outcome of time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack. Safety endpoints were haemorrhagic events and incidence of other adverse events, and were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00501059. Findings Between July 5, 2007, and Nov 15, 2016, 12 546 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aspirin (n=6270) or placebo (n=6276) at 501 study sites. Median follow-up was 60 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary endpoint occurred in 269 (4·29%) patients in the aspirin group versus 281 (4·48%) patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·96; 95% CI 0·81-1·13; p=0·6038). Gastrointestinal bleeding events (mostly mild) occurred in 61 (0·97%) patients in the aspirin group versus 29 (0·46%) in the placebo group (HR 2·11; 95% CI 1·36-3·28; p=0·0007). The overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was similar in both treatment groups (n=1266 [20·19%] in the aspirin group vs n=1311 [20·89%] in the placebo group. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups (n=5142 [82·01%] vs n=5129 [81·72%] in the placebo group). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low (n=1050 [16·75%] vs n=850 [13·54%] in the placebo group; p<0·0001). There were 321 documented deaths in the intention-to-treat population (n=160 [2·55%] vs n=161 [2·57%] of 6276 patients in the placebo group). Interpretation The event rate was much lower than expected, which is probably reflective of contemporary risk management strategies, making the study more representative of a low-risk population. The role of aspirin in primary prevention among patients at moderate risk could therefore not be addressed. Nonetheless, the findings with respect to aspirin's effects are consistent with those observed in the previously published low-risk primary prevention studies. Funding Bayer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31924-x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ARRIVE, gastrointestinal bleeding events (characterized as mild) occurred in 0.97% of individuals in the aspirin group vs 0.46% in the placebo group (HR 2.11; P = 0.0007).

    “Gastrointestinal bleeding events (characterized as mild) occurred in 0.97% of individuals in the aspirin group vs. 0.46% in the placebo group (HR 2.11 [95% ; P = 0.0007).”
  • Two other large randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, ARRIVE (in people without diabetes) and ASPREE (in the elderly, 11% with diabetes), found no benefit of aspirin on the primary efficacy end point and an increased risk of bleeding.

    “Two other large, randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, in people without diabetes (ARRIVE [Aspirin to Reduce Risk of Initial Vascular Events]) (180) and in the elderly (ASPREE [Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly]) (181), in which 11% of participants had diabetes, found no benefit of aspirin on the primary efficacy end point and an increased risk of bleeding.”
  • In ARRIVE, the primary end point occurred in 4.29% vs 4.48% of individuals in the aspirin versus placebo groups (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.81-1.13]; P = 0.60).

    “In ARRIVE, with 12,546 individuals over a period of 60 months of follow-up, the primary end point occurred in 4.29% vs. 4.48% of individuals in the aspirin versus placebo groups (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.81-1.13];P = 0.60).”
  • Two other large randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, ARRIVE in people without diabetes and ASPREE in the elderly (11% with diabetes), found no benefit of aspirin on the primary efficacy end point and an increased risk of bleeding.

    “Two other large, randomized trials of aspirin for primary prevention, in people without diabetes (ARRIVE [Aspirin to Reduce Risk of Initial Vascular Events]) (174) and in the elderly (ASPREE [Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly]) (175), in which 11% of participants had diabetes, found no benefit of aspirin on the primary efficacy end point and an increased risk of bleeding.”
  • In ARRIVE, gastrointestinal bleeding events (characterized as mild) occurred in 0.97% of individuals in the aspirin group vs 0.46% in the placebo group (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.36-3.28]; P = 0.0007).

    “Gastrointestinal bleeding events (characterized as mild) occurred in 0.97% of individuals in the aspirin group vs. 0.46% in the placebo group (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.36–3.28]; P = 0.0007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]Smith SC Jr Benjamin EJ Bonow RO World Heart Federation and the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation Circulation 2011 124 2458 73 22052934
  2. [7]Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group N Engl J Med 1989 321 129 35 2664509
  3. [19]National Cholesterol Education Program Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Executive summary 2001 accessed Aug 13, 2018 https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/atp3xsum.pdf 11368702
  4. [21]Berkowitz SD Granger CB Pieper KS Incidence and predictors of bleeding after contemporary thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction. The Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen activator for Occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO) I Investigators Circulation 1997 95 2508 16 9184581

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaziano, J. M., Brotons, C., Coppolecchia, R., Cricelli, C., Darius, H., Gorelick, P. B., Howard, G., Pearson, T. A., Rothwell, P. M., Ruilope, L. M., Tendera, M., & Tognoni, G.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES)
  • Bayer (United States) (US)
  • Società Italiana di Medicina Generale (IT)
  • Vivantes Klinikum (DE)
  • Mercy Health (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
Corresponding author
Gaziano, J Michael
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
392
Issue
10152
Pages
1036-1046
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2888108651
Cited by
883
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 3
FWCI
86.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
aspirin, primary prevention, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular events, older adults, gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding risk, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, serious adverse events, ARRIVE trial, enteric-coated aspirin, placebo comparison, risk stratification, bleeding risk assessment, secondary prevention, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aspirin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Risk Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Stroke, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review