The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed durable antitumour activity and manageable safety in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We aimed to examine whether the addition of pembrolizumab would enhance the antitumour activity of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial, done in 209 sites in 29 countries, we randomly assigned patients 2:1 with untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using a block method (block size of six) and an interactive voice-response system with integrated web-response to pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel; paclitaxel; or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) or placebo plus chemotherapy. Randomisation was stratified by type of on-study chemotherapy (taxane or gemcitabine-carboplatin), PD-L1 expression at baseline (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1 or <1), and previous treatment with the same class of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting (yes or no). Eligibility criteria included age at least 18 years, centrally confirmed triple-negative breast cancer; at least one measurable lesion; provision of a newly obtained tumour sample for determination of triple-negative breast cancer status and PD-L1 status by immunohistochemistry at a central laboratory; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. The sponsor, investigators, other study site staff (except for the unmasked pharmacist), and patients were masked to pembrolizumab versus saline placebo administration. In addition, the sponsor, the investigators, other study site staff, and patients were masked to patient-level tumour PD-L1 biomarker results. Dual primary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival assessed in the PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and intention-to-treat populations. The definitive assessment of progression-free survival was done at this interim analysis; follow-up to assess overall survival is continuing. For progression-free survival, a hierarchical testing strategy was used, such that testing was done first in patients with CPS of 10 or more (prespecified statistical criterion was α=0·00411 at this interim analysis), then in patients with CPS of 1 or more (α=0·00111 at this interim analysis, with partial alpha from progression-free survival in patients with CPS of 10 or more passed over), and finally in the intention-to-treat population (α=0·00111 at this interim analysis). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819518, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Jan 9, 2017, and June 12, 2018, of 1372 patients screened, 847 were randomly assigned to treatment, with 566 patients in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 281 patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff, Dec 11, 2019), median follow-up was 25·9 months (IQR 22·8-29·9) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 26·3 months (22·7-29·7) in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Among patients with CPS of 10 or more, median progression-free survival was 9·7 months with pembrolizumab-chemotherapy and 5·6 months with placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0·65, 95% CI 0·49-0·86; one-sided p=0·0012 [primary objective met]). Median progression-free survival was 7·6 and 5·6 months (HR, 0·74, 0·61-0·90; one-sided p=0·0014 [not significant]) among patients with CPS of 1 or more and 7·5 and 5·6 months (HR, 0·82, 0·69-0·97 [not tested]) among the intention-to-treat population. The pembrolizumab treatment effect increased with PD-L1 enrichment. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event rates were 68% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 67% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in <1% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 0% in the placebo-chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival versus placebo-chemotherapy among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with CPS of 10 or more. These findings suggest a role for the addition of pembrolizumab to standard chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy
Pardoll, D. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3239 · Cited by 13,838
PD-1 and Its Ligands in Tolerance and Immunity
Keir, M. E., Butte, M. J., Freeman, G. J., & Sharpe, A. H. (2008) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331 · Cited by 5,378
Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer
Schmid, P., Adams, S., Rugo, H. S., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Diéras, V., Hegg, R., Im, S.-A., Shaw Wright, G., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1809615 · Cited by 4,350
Self-citationPembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid, P., Cortes, J., Pusztai, L., McArthur, H., Kümmel, S., Bergh, J., Denkert, C., Park, Y. H., Hui, R., Harbeck, N., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910549 · Cited by 3,270
Adams, S., Schmid, P., Rugo, H. S., Winer, E. P., Loirat, D., Awada, A., Cescon, D. W., Iwata, H., Campone, M., Nanda, R., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy517 · Cited by 807
Self-citationNanda, R., Liu, M. C., Yau, C., Shatsky, R., Pusztai, L., Wallace, A., Chien, A. J., Forero-Torres, A., Ellis, E., Han, H., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6650 · Cited by 710
Self-citationSchmid, P., Salgado, R., Park, Y. H., Muñoz-Couselo, E., Kim, S. B., Sohn, J., Im, S.-A., Foukakis, T., Kuemmel, S., Dent, R., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.072 · Cited by 413
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Dent, 2009, Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 115, 423, 10.1007/s10549-008-0086-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Kassam, 2009, Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: implications for clinical practice and trial design, Clin Breast Cancer, 9, 29, 10.3816/CBC.2009.n.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Gucalp, 2011, Triple-negative breast cancer: adjuvant therapeutic options, Chemother Res Pract, 2011
- Arnedos, 2012, Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?, Ther Adv Med Oncol, 4, 195, 10.1177/1758834012444711 · DOI
- Disis, 2010, Immune regulation of cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 4531, 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.2146 · DOI · Paper page
- Adams, 2019, Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-positive, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: cohort B of the phase II KEYNOTE-086 study, Ann Oncol, 30, 405, 10.1093/annonc/mdy518 · DOI · Paper page
- Nanda, 2016, Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study, J Clin Oncol, 34, 2460, 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8931 · DOI · Paper page
- Ramakrishnan, 2011, Mechanism of synergistic effect of chemotherapy and immunotherapy of cancer, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 60, 419, 10.1007/s00262-010-0930-1 · DOI
- Hammond, 2010, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 2784, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 · DOI · Paper page
- Wolff, 2007, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 25, 118, 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 · DOI · Paper page
- Oken, 1982, Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Am J Clin Oncol, 5, 649, 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 · DOI · Paper page
- Kulangara, 2019, Clinical utility of the combined positive score for programmed death ligand-1 expression and the approval of pembrolizumab for treatment of gastric cancer, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 143, 330, 10.5858/arpa.2018-0043-OA · DOI · Paper page
- Maurer, 2013, Multiple testing in group sequential trials using graphical approaches, Stat Biopharm Res, 5, 311, 10.1080/19466315.2013.807748 · DOI
- Emens, 2019, Long-term clinical outcomes and biomarker analyses of atezolizumab therapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 1 study, JAMA Oncol, 5, 74, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4224 · DOI · Paper page
- Dirix, 2018, Avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a phase 1b JAVELIN Solid Tumor study, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 167, 671, 10.1007/s10549-017-4537-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Vennapusa, 2019, Development of a PD-L1 complementary diagnostic immunohistochemistry assay (SP142) for atezolizumab, Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol, 27, 92, 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000594 · DOI · Paper page
- Rugo HS, Loi S, Adams S, et al. Exploratory analytical harmonization of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays in advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective substudy of IMpassion130. 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, USA; Dec 10–14, 2019. PD1-07. · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-pd1-07
- Torlakovic, 2020, “Interchangeability” of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, Mod Pathol, 33, 4, 10.1038/s41379-019-0327-4 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C., & Curigliano, G. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3 · Cited by 1,648
Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions
Yi, M., Zheng, X., Niu, M., Zhu, S., Ge, H., & Wu, K. (2022) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-021-01489-2 · Cited by 1,445
5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5)
Cardoso, F., Paluch-Shimon, S., Senkus, E., Curigliano, G., Aapro, M. S., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Bhattacharyya, G. S., Biganzoli, L., et al. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010 · Cited by 1,369
Self-citationTreatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer — expanded options, evolving needs
Bianchini, G., De Angelis, C., Licata, L., & Gianni, L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00565-2 · Cited by 1,382
Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Schmid, P., Cortes, J., Dent, R., Pusztai, L., McArthur, H., Kümmel, S., Bergh, J., Denkert, C., Park, Y. H., Hui, R., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2112651 · Cited by 1,274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cortes, J., Cescon, D. W., Rugo, H. S., Nowecki, Z., Im, S.-A., Yusof, M. M., Gallardo, C., Lipatov, O., Barrios, C. H., Holgado, E., Iwata, H., Masuda, N., Otero, M. T., Gokmen, E., Loi, S., Guo, Z., Zhao, J., Aktan, G., Karantza, V., Schmid, P., Luis, F., Gonzalo, G. A., Diego, K., Ruben, K., Matias, M., Mirta, V., Sally, B.-H., Stephen, B., Philip, C., Sherene, L., Dhanusha, S., Andrea, G., Donatienne, T., Carlos, B., Leandro, B., Fabiano, C., Ruffo, D. F. J., Roberto, H., Domicio Carvalho, L., Fernando Cezar Toniazzi, L., Roberto Odebrecht, R., Antonio Orlando, S. N., Felipe, S., David, C., Danielle, C., Cristiano, F., Xinni, S., Joanne, Y., Alejandro, A., Carlos, G., Claudio, S., Cesar, S., Eduardo, Y., Alvaro, G. D., Jesus, S., Petra, H., Zdenek, K., Bohuslav, M., Katarina, P., Jana, P., Vesna, G., Erik, J., Jeanette, J., Soren, L., Tamas, L., Herve, B., Isabelle, D., Anthony, G., Anne-Claire, H.-B., Luis, T., Jens-Uwe, B., Peter, F., Dirk, F., Nadia, H., Jens, H., Anna, K. F. D. S., Christian, K., Sibylle, L., Diana, L., Tjoung-Won, P.-S., Raquel Von, S., Pauline, W., Louis, C., Ava, K., Kai Cheong Roger, N., Peter, A., Tibor, C., Zsuzsanna, K., Laszlo, L., Karoly, M., Gabor, R., John, C., Catherine, K., Seamus, O., Saverio, C., Antonietta, D., Enrico, R., Tomoyuki, A., Takaaki, F., Kenichi, I., Takashi, I., Yoshinori, I., Tsutomu, I., Hiroji, I., Yoshimasa, K., Koji, M., Yasuo, M., Hirofumi, M., Seigo, N., Naoki, N., Shoichiro, O., Akihiko, O., Yasuaki, S., Eiji, S., Masato, T., Yuko, T., Kenji, T., Koichiro, T., Junichiro, W., Naohito, Y., Yutaka, Y., Teruo, Y., Anita, B., Mastura, M. Y., Angel, G. V., Alejandro, J. R., Jorge, M. R., Flavia, M.-V., Jessica, R. C., Karin, B., Vivianne, T.-H., David, P., Ewa, C., Ewa, N.-Z., Zbigniew, N., Barbara, R., Joanna, S., Cezary, S., Rafal, T., Bogdan, Z., Alexander, A., Natalia, F., Oleg, L., Andrey, M., Vladimir, M., Guzel, M., Jin Hee, A., Seock-Ah, I., Keun Seok, L., Kwong Hwa, P., Yeon Hee, P., Begona, B. D. L. H., Javier, C., Josefina, C. J., Luis, D. L. C. M., Jose, G. S., Maria, G., Esther, H., Esther, Z. A., Chien-Ting, L., Mei-Ching, L., Chiun-Sheng, H., Chao-Jung, T., Ling-Ming, T., Cagatay, A., Gul, B., Irfan, C., Erhan, G., Seyda, G., Nil, M. M., Mustafa, O., Ozgur, O., Sinan, Y., Steve, C., Janine, G., Iain, M., Peter, S., Nicholas, T., Mark, T., Christopher, T., Duncan, W., Hryhoriy, A., Oleksandr, B., Igor, B., Oleksii, K., Olena, K., Hanna, K., Anna, K., Iurii, L., Alla, N., Natalya, O., Olga, P., Andrii, R., Sergii, S., Yaroslav, S., Dmytro, T., Grygorii, U., Ihor, V., Sibel, B., Madhu, C., Michael, C., Patrick, C., Scott, C., Jennifer, D., Keerthi, G., Jeffrey, H., Kent, H., William, I., Randa, L., Janice, L., Raul, M., Susan, M., Rita, N., Ira, O., Coral, O., Timothy, P., Amit, P., Brian, P., Hope, R., Irina, R., Michael, S., Robert, S., Michael, S., Laura, S., Bradley, S., Michaela, T., & Frances, V.-A.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 396
- Issue
- 10265
- Pages
- 1817-1828
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W3109853980
- Cited by
- 1,796
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 74.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32531-9
- The paper
- Cortes, J., Cescon, D. W., Rugo, H. S., Nowecki, Z., Im, S.-A., Yusof, M. M., Gallardo, C., Lipatov, O., Barrios, C. H., Holgado, E., Iwata, H., Masuda, N., Otero, M. T., Gokmen, E., Loi, S., Guo, Z., Zhao, J., Aktan, G., Karantza, V., . . . Frances, V.-A. (2020). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32531-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.