Cited by 1,041SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study

Open access
Wolter, Nicole, Jassat, Waasila, Walaza, Sibongile, Welch, Richard, Moultrie, Harry, Groome, Michelle, Amoako, Daniel Gyamfi, Everatt, Josie +20 more·2022·The Lancet

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant of concern was identified in South Africa in November, 2021, and was associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases. We aimed to assess the clinical severity of infections with the omicron variant using S gene target failure (SGTF) on the Thermo Fisher Scientific TaqPath COVID-19 PCR test as a proxy. METHODS: We did data linkages for national, South African COVID-19 case data, SARS-CoV-2 laboratory test data, SARS-CoV-2 genome data, and COVID-19 hospital admissions data. For individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 via TaqPath PCR tests, infections were designated as either SGTF or non-SGTF. The delta variant was identified by genome sequencing. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we assessed disease severity and hospitalisations by comparing individuals with SGTF versus non-SGTF infections diagnosed between Oct 1 and Nov 30, 2021, and we further assessed disease severity by comparing SGTF-infected individuals diagnosed between Oct 1 and Nov 30, 2021, with delta variant-infected individuals diagnosed between April 1 and Nov 9, 2021. FINDINGS: From Oct 1 (week 39), 2021, to Dec 6 (week 49), 2021, 161 328 cases of COVID-19 were reported in South Africa. 38 282 people were diagnosed via TaqPath PCR tests and 29 721 SGTF infections and 1412 non-SGTF infections were identified. The proportion of SGTF infections increased from two (3·2%) of 63 in week 39 to 21 978 (97·9%) of 22 455 in week 48. After controlling for factors associated with hospitalisation, individuals with SGTF infections had significantly lower odds of admission than did those with non-SGTF infections (256 [2·4%] of 10 547 vs 121 [12·8%] of 948; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·2, 95% CI 0·1-0·3). After controlling for factors associated with disease severity, the odds of severe disease were similar between hospitalised individuals with SGTF versus non-SGTF infections (42 [21%] of 204 vs 45 [40%] of 113; aOR 0·7, 95% CI 0·3-1·4). Compared with individuals with earlier delta variant infections, SGTF-infected individuals had a significantly lower odds of severe disease (496 [62·5%] of 793 vs 57 [23·4%] of 244; aOR 0·3, 95% CI 0·2-0·5), after controlling for factors associated with disease severity. INTERPRETATION: Our early analyses suggest a significantly reduced odds of hospitalisation among individuals with SGTF versus non-SGTF infections diagnosed during the same time period. SGTF-infected individuals had a significantly reduced odds of severe disease compared with individuals infected earlier with the delta variant. Some of this reduced severity is probably a result of previous immunity. FUNDING: The South African Medical Research Council, the South African National Department of Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the African Society of Laboratory Medicine, Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the Fleming Fund.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00017-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Case numbers were insufficient to estimate the duration of protection against COVID-19 hospitalization and death for each Omicron subvariant separately.

    “With the lower severity of Omicron infections24,25 and the young population of Qatar15,26, case numbers were insufficient to estimate the duration of protection against COVID-19 hospitalization and death for each subvariant separately.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]Meng B Ferreira IATM Abdullahi A SARS-CoV-2 omicron spike mediated immune escape, infectivity and cell-cell fusion bioRxiv 2021 published online Dec 22. 10.1101/2021.12.17.473248 (preprint). · DOI · Paper page
  2. [19]HKUMed HKUMed finds omicron SARS-CoV-2 can infect faster and better than delta in human bronchus but with less severe infection in lung https://www.med.hku.hk/en/news/press/20211215-omicron-sars-cov-2-infection Dec 15, 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolter, N., Jassat, W., Walaza, S., Welch, R., Moultrie, H., Groome, M., Amoako, D. G., Everatt, J., Bhiman, J. N., Scheepers, C., Tebeila, N., Chiwandire, N., du Plessis, M., Govender, N., Ismail, A., Glass, A., Mlisana, K., Stevens, W., Treurnicht, F. K., Makatini, Z., Hsiao, N.-Y., Parboosing, R., Wadula, J., Hussey, H., Davies, M.-A., Boulle, A., von Gottberg, A., & Cohen, C.
Affiliations
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • Lancet Laboratories (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Wolter, Nicole
  • Cohen, Cheryl
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
399
Issue
10323
Pages
437-446
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4206027538
Cited by
1,041
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 270 · 2022: 545 · 2021: 10
FWCI
123.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5 U01IP001048\u201305\u201300, AF-NICD-001/2021)
  • National Department of Health
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Health Laboratory Service
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • Sanofi Pasteur
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-018978)
  • Fogarty International Center
  • Wellcome Trust (203135/Z/16/Z, 221003/Z/20/Z, 222754)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
S-gene target failure, Delta variant, hospitalization, disease severity, South Africa, SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing, data linkage, Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.2
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, South Africa, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Information Storage and Retrieval, Genome, Viral, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review