Cited by 52SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

SARS-CoV-2 transmission, persistence of immunity, and estimates of Omicron’s impact in South African population cohorts

Open access
Sun, Kaiyuan, Tempia, Stefano, Kleynhans, Jackie, von Gottberg, Anne, McMorrow, Meredith L., Wolter, Nicole, Bhiman, Jinal N., Moyes, Jocelyn +13 more·2022·Science Translational Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Understanding the build-up of immunity with successive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants and the epidemiological conditions that favor rapidly expanding epidemics will help facilitate future pandemic control. We analyzed high-resolution infection and serology data from two longitudinal household cohorts in South Africa to reveal high cumulative infection rates and durable cross-protective immunity conferred by prior infection in the pre-Omicron era. Building on the history of past exposures to different SARS-CoV-2 variants and vaccination in the cohort most representative of South Africa’s high urbanization rate, we used mathematical models to explore the fitness advantage of the Omicron variant and its epidemic trajectory. Modeling suggests that the Omicron wave likely infected a large fraction (44 to 81%) of the population, leaving a complex landscape of population immunity primed and boosted with antigenically distinct variants. We project that future SARS-CoV-2 resurgences are likely under a range of scenarios of viral characteristics, population contacts, and residual cross-protection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo7081

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This observation is in line with the finding of a durable immune protection conferred by prior infection and vaccination in the pre-Omicron era.

    “This observation is in line with the finding of a durable immune protection conferred by prior infection and vaccination in the pre-Omicron era 10 .”
  • Infections predating the Omicron BA.1/2 wave were ascertained based on both variant-specific PCR tests and serology, covering the period through blood draw 8, or mid-September, 2021.

    “We ascertained infections predating the Omicron BA.1/2 wave based on both variant-specific PCR tests and serology, as detailed in a prior study 10 , covering the period through blood draw 8, or mid-September, 2021.”
  • Based on variant-typed respiratory specimens during the intense follow-up period, serologic testing, as well as information on vaccine administration, the study had the unusual opportunity to track each individual participant's SARS-CoV-2 antigen exposure history in chronological order.

    “Based on variant-typed respiratory specimens during the intense follow-up period 9,10 , serologic testing, as well as information on vaccine administration, we had the unusual opportunity to track each individual participant's SARS-CoV-2 antigen exposure history in chronological order.”
  • A unique feature of the cohort populations includes intense monitoring since the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave, with nasal swab collection at a twice weekly frequency, combined with frequent serum specimen collection.

    “A unique feature of our cohort populations includes intense monitoring since the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave, with nasal swab collection at a twice weekly frequency, combined with frequent serum specimen collection 10 .”
  • The infection ascertainment rate was estimated at 0.84% in the rural site district and 1.31% in the urban site district, considerably lower than the ascertainment rates of prior waves, indicating that the surveillance system captured only a very small fraction of all Omicron BA.1/2 infections.

    “The infection ascertainment rate was estimated at 0.84% in the rural site district and 1.31% in the urban site district, considerably lower than the ascertainment rates of prior waves 10,11 , indicating that the surveillance system captured only a very small fraction of all Omicron BA.1/2 infections.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. J. A. Lewnard, V. X. Hong, M. M. Patel, R. Kahn, M. Lipsitch, S. Y. Tartof, Clinical outcomes among patients infected with Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant in southern California. bioRxiv (2022), doi:. 10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045 PMC10208005 35675841 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, K., Tempia, S., Kleynhans, J., von Gottberg, A., McMorrow, M. L., Wolter, N., Bhiman, J. N., Moyes, J., du Plessis, M., Carrim, M., Buys, A., Martinson, N. A., Kahn, K., Tollman, S., Lebina, L., Wafawanaka, F., du Toit, J. D., Gómez-Olivé, F. X., Mkhencele, T., Viboud, C., & Cohen, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
  • Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, 2131, South Africa.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
  • Division of International Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-2220, USA.
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Kaiyuan
  • Cohen, Cheryl
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2022-08-24
Volume
14
Issue
659
Pages
eabo7081-eabo7081
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W4281663532
Cited by
52
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (221003/Z/20/Z)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01IP001048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant, cross-protective immunity, prior infection, serology, epidemic trajectory, viral fitness, epidemic projection, SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccination, South Africa, herd immunity
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, South Africa, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review