The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomised study of cognitive effects of iron supplementation in non-anaemic iron-deficient adolescent girls
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Up to 25% of adolescent girls in the USA are iron deficient. This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of iron supplementation on cognitive function in adolescent girls with non-anaemic iron deficiency. METHODS: 716 girls who enrolled at four Baltimore high schools were screened for non-anaemic iron deficiency (serum ferritin < or = 12 micrograms/L with normal haemoglobin). 98 (13.7%) girls had non-anaemic iron deficiency of whom 81 were enrolled in the trial. Participants were randomly assigned oral ferrous sulphate (650 mg twice daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. The effect of iron treatment was assessed by questionnaires and haematological and cognitive tests, which were done before treatment started and repeated after the intervention. We used four tests of attention and memory to measure cognitive functioning. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. FINDINGS: Of the 81 enrolled girls with non-anaemic iron deficiency, 78 (96%) completed the study (39 in each group). Five girls (three control, two treatment) developed anaemia during the intervention and were excluded from the analyses. Thus, 73 girls were included in the per-protocol analysis. Ethnic distribution, mean age, serum ferritin concentrations, haemoglobin concentrations, and cognitive test scores of the groups did not differ significantly at baseline. Postintervention haematological measures of iron status were significantly improved in the treatment group (serum ferritin 27.3 vs 12.1 micrograms/L, p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that girls who received iron performed better on a test of verbal learning and memory than girls in the control group (p < 0.02). INTERPRETATION: In this urban population of non-anaemic iron-deficient adolescent girls, iron supplementation improved verbal learning and memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms
Brandt, J. (1991) · Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854049108403297 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationIntention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Cited by
A review of studies on the effect of iron deficiency on cognitive development in children
Grantham-McGregor, S., & Ani, C. (2001) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.2.649s · Cited by 1,293
I RON S TATUS AND N EURAL F UNCTIONING
Beard, J. L., & Connor, J. R. (2003) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.020102.075739 · Cited by 669
Cappellini, M. D., Comin‐Colet, J., de Francisco, A., Dignass, A., Doehner, W., Lam, C. S., Macdougall, I. C., Rogler, G., Camaschella, C., Kadir, R., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1002/ajh.24820 · Cited by 502
McCann, J. C., & Ames, B. N. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.4.931 · Cited by 501
Sachdev, H., Gera, T., & Nestel, P. (2005) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2004677 · Cited by 378
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruner, A. B., Joffe, A., Duggan, A. K., Casella, J. F., & Brandt, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 9033
- Pages
- 992-996
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2090470708
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.