Cited by 791Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners

Bonde, Jens Peter E, Ernst, Erik, Jensen, Tina Kold, Hjollund, Niels Henrik I, Kolstad, Henrik, Scheike, Thomas, Giwercman, Aleksander, Skakkebæk, Niels Erik +2 more·1998·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Semen analysis is part of the routine assessment of infertile couples. WHO defines a sperm concentration above 20x10(6) per mL seminal fluid as normal. We studied the association between semen quality and the probability of conception in a single menstrual cycle in Danish couples with no previous reproductive experience. Methods In 1992-94, we invited 52,255 trades-union members aged 20-35 years, who lived with a partner and had no children to take part in the study; 430 couples agreed. The couples discontinued use of contraception, and were followed up for six menstrual cycles or until a pregnancy was verified within this period. Each man was asked to provide a semen sample at enrolment (which was analysed without freezing). Women kept a daily record of vaginal bleeding and sexual activity. The association between semen quality and likelihood of pregnancy was assessed by logistic regression, adjusted for sexual activity and female factors associated with low fertility. Results There were 256 (59.5%) pregnancies among the 430 couples: 165 (65.0%) among those with a sperm concentration of 40x10(6)/mL or more and 84 (51.2%) among those with lower sperm concentrations. The probability of conception increased with increasing sperm concentration up to 40x10(6)/mL, but any higher sperm density was not associated with additional likelihood of pregnancy. The proportion of sperm with normal morphology was strongly related to likelihood of pregnancy independently of sperm co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10514-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonde, J. P. E., Ernst, E., Jensen, T. K., Hjollund, N. H. I., Kolstad, H., Scheike, T., Giwercman, A., Skakkebæk, N. E., Henriksen, T. B., & Olsen, J.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Bonde, Jens Peter E
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
352
Issue
9135
Pages
1172-1177
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2068925756
Cited by
791
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 40
FWCI
18.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
semen quality, male fertility, sperm concentration, sperm morphology, conception probability, first pregnancy, subfertility, semen analysis, semen volume, sperm motility, couples without children
MeSH terms
Adult, Denmark, Female, Fertility, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Semen, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, World Health Organization, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review