Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,975

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale

Yoo, Boonghee, Donthu, Naveen·2001·Journal of Business Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00098-3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Aaker, 1996, Measuring brand equity across products and markets, Calif Manage Rev, 38, 102, 10.2307/41165845 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aaker, 1990, Consumer evaluations of brand extensions, J Mark, 54, 27, 10.2307/1252171 · doi:10.2307/1252171 · Paper page
  3. Aaker, 1997, Dimensions of brand personality, J Mark Res, 34, 347, 10.2307/3151897 · doi:10.2307/3151897 · Paper page
  4. Agarwal, 1996, An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity, Mark Lett, 7, 237, 10.1007/BF00435740 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Alba, 1987, Wesley: dimensions of consumer expertise, J Consum Res, 13, 411, 10.1086/209080 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ambler, 1997, How much of brand equity is explained by trust?, Manage Decis, 35, 283, 10.1108/00251749710169666 · DOI
  7. Barwise, 1993, Brand equity: snark or boojum?, Int J Res Mark, 10, 93, 10.1016/0167-8116(93)90036-X · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(93)90036-x
  8. Beatty, 1988, Alternative hierarchies of the attitude–behavior relationship: the impact of brand commitment and habit, J Acad Mark Sci, 16, 1, 10.1007/BF02723310 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Beckwith, 1975, The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models, J Mark Res, 12, 265, 10.2307/3151224 · DOI
  10. Berry, 1980, Introduction to methodology, vol. 2, 1
  11. Bharadwaj, 1993, Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions, J Mark, 57, 83, 10.2307/1252221 · doi:10.2307/1252221 · Paper page
  12. Boulding, 1993, A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?, J Consum Res, 20, 111, 10.1086/209337 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Burnett, 1986, An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research, J Bus Res, 14, 329, 10.1016/0148-2963(86)90024-X · DOI
  14. Burnkrant, 1982, An examination of the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of fishbein's behavioral intention model, J Mark Res, 19, 550, 10.2307/3151726 · DOI
  15. Byrne, 1989, Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance, Psychol Bull, 105, 456, 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 · Paper page
  16. Calder, 1981, Designing research for application, J Consum Res, 8, 197, 10.1086/208856 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Cobb-Walgren, 1995, Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent, J Advertising, 24, 25, 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673481 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cooper, 1981, Ubiquitous halo, Psychol Bull, 90, 218, 10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cox, 1997, Tipton: do product warnings increase safe behavior? A meta-analysis, J Public Policy Mark, 16, 195, 10.1177/074391569701600201 · DOI
  20. Deshpande, 1986, The intensity of ethnic affiliation: a study of the sociology of Hispanic consumption, J Consum Res, 13, 214, 10.1086/209061 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dodds, 1991, Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluation, J Mark Res, 28, 307, 10.2307/3172866 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Durvasula, 1993, Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of consumer behavior models: a model of attitude toward advertising in general, J Consum Res, 19, 626, 10.1086/209327 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Farquhar PH, Han JY, Ijiri Y. Recognizing and measuring brand assets. Working Paper Series, Report Number 91-119. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 1991.
  24. Fazio, 1981, Direct experience and attitude–behavior consistency, vol. 14, 162
  25. Guadagni, 1983, A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data, Mark Sci, 2, 203, 10.1287/mksc.2.3.203 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gupta, 1988, Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy, J Mark Res, 251, 342, 10.2307/3172945 · DOI
  27. Kamakura, 1993, Measuring brand value with scanner data, Int J Res Mark, 10, 9, 10.1016/0167-8116(93)90030-3 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Keller, 1993, Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity, J Mark, 57, 1, 10.2307/1252054 · doi:10.2307/1252054 · Paper page
  29. Lane, 1995, Stock market reactions to brand extension announcements: the effects of brand attitude and familiarity, J Mark, 59, 63, 10.2307/1252015 · DOI
  30. Leung, 1989, On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons, J Cross-Cult Psychol, 20, 133, 10.1177/0022022189202002 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Levidge, 1961, A model of predictive measurement of advertising effectiveness, J Mark, 25, 59, 10.2307/1248516 · doi:10.2307/1248516 · Paper page
  32. Lichtenstein, 1989, The relationship between perceived and objective price–quality, J Mark Res, 26, 429, 10.2307/3172763 · DOI
  33. Mahajan, 1994, An approach to assess the importance of brand equity in acquisition decisions, J Prod Innovation Manage, 11, 221, 10.1016/0737-6782(94)90005-1 · DOI
  34. Nelson, 1974, Advertising as information, J Polit Econ, 81, 729, 10.1086/260231 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Netemeyer, 1991, A cross-cultural assessment of the reliability and validity of the CETSCALE, J Mark Res, 28, 320, 10.2307/3172867 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Olian, 1988, The impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations, Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes, 41, 180, 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90025-8 · DOI
  37. Owenbey, 1998, The Suinn–Lew Asian self-identity acculturation scale: test with a non-student, Asian-American sample, Soc Behav Pers, 26, 57, 10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.57 · DOI
  38. Park, 1994, A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility, J Mark Res, 31, 271, 10.2307/3152199 · doi:10.2307/3152199 · Paper page
  39. Petroshius, 1987, Effect of product-line pricing characteristics on product evaluations, J Mark Res, 13, 511
  40. Rangaswamy, 1993, Brand equity and the extendibility of brand names, Int J Res Mark, 10, 61, 10.1016/0167-8116(93)90034-V · DOI · Paper page
  41. Rosenzweig, 1994, When can management science research be generalized internationally?, Manage Sci, 40, 28, 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.28 · DOI
  42. Sheth, 1970, Are there differences in dissonance reduction behavior between students and housewives?, J Mark Res, 7, 243, 10.2307/3150115 · DOI
  43. Shimp, 1982, Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions, J Consum Res., 9, 38, 10.1086/208894 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Shocker AD, Weitz B. A perspective on brand equity principles and issues. In: Leuthesser L, editor. Report Number 88-104. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 1988. pp. 2–4.
  45. Simon, 1993, The measurement and determinants of brand equity: a financial approach, Mark Sci, 12, 28, 10.1287/mksc.12.1.28 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Smith, 1983, Attitude–behavior consistency: the impact of product trial versus advertising, J Mark Res., 20, 257, 10.2307/3151829 · doi:10.2307/3151829 · Paper page
  47. Srivastava R, Shocker AD. Brand equity: a perspective on its meaning and measurement. Working Paper Series, Report Number 91-124. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 1991.
  48. Srull, 1984, Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition, vol. 2, 1
  49. Steenkamp, 1998, Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research, J Consum Res, 25, 78, 10.1086/209528 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Stelzl, 1986, Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit: some rules for generating equivalent path models, Multivariate Behav Res, 21, 309, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2103_3 · DOI
  51. Sullivan, 1998, How brand names affect the demand for twin automobiles, J Mark Res, 35, 154, 10.2307/3151844 · doi:10.2307/3151844
  52. Swait, 1993, The equalization price: a measure of consumer-perceived brand equity, Int J Res Mark, 10, 23, 10.1016/0167-8116(93)90031-S · DOI · Paper page
  53. Wallendorf, 1983, Ethnic migration, assimilation, and consumption, J Consum Res, 10, 292, 10.1086/208968 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Wells, 1993, Discovery-oriented consumer research, J Consum Res, 19, 489, 10.1086/209318 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Yavas, 1994, Research note: students as subjects in advertising and marketing research, Int Mark Rev, 11, 35, 10.1108/02651339410069236 · DOI
  56. Yoo, 2000, An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity, J Acad Mark Sci, 28, 195, 10.1177/0092070300282002 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Zeithaml, 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means–end model and synthesis of evidence, J Mark, 52, 2, 10.2307/1251446 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,975

Metadata

Authors
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161246478
Cited by
2,975
References
6
FWCI
46.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00098-3
The paper
Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00098-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.