The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Age-related Maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To determine the prevalence of age-related maculopathy in an elderly population in The Netherlands.Methods Fundus photographs of 6251 participants of the Rotterdam Study, a single-center prospective follow-up study in persons 55 to 98 years of age, were reviewed for the presence of drusen, pigmentary abnormalities, and atrophic or neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Results The prevalence of at least one drusen of 63 microns or larger increased from 40.8% in persons 55 to 64 years of age to 52.6% in those 85 years of age or older. Similarly, the prevalence of the following abnormalities increased significantly in these age categories: drusen of 125 microns or larger from 4.8% to 17.5%, retinal pigment epithelial hypopigmentations from 3.5% to 9.0%, and increased retinal pigment from 3.7% to 15.3%. Atrophic or neovascular age-related macular degeneration was present in 1.7% of the total population. Atrophic age-related macular degeneration increased from 0.1% in persons 55 to 64 years of age to 3.7% in those 85 years of age or older. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration increased from 0.1% to 7.4% in these age groups. No sex differences were observed for these lesions.Conclusions The prevalence of atrophic or neovascular age-related macular degeneration is 1.7%. In those 55 years of age or older, the prevalence increases strongly with age and it is similar in men and women. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration was twice as common as atrophic age-related macular degeneration. These findings suggest that age-related maculopathy may be less common in this European population than in similar populations in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Neovascular AMD accounts for over 90% of severe central vision loss among patients with AMD (116, 154, 161).”
From Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as [154]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,666
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Prevalence of age-related maculopathy
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., & Linton, K. L. P. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31871-8 · Cited by 1,845
Klein, R., Klein, R., Moss, S. E., & Linton, K. L. P. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)32011-1 · Cited by 1,382
Leibowitz, H. M., Krueger, D. E., Maunder, L. R., Milton, R. C., KINI, M. M., Kahn, H. A., Nickerson, R. J., Pool, J., Colton, T., Ganley, J. P., et al. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 1,250
The Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System
Klein, R., Davis, M. D., Magli, Y. L., Segał, P., Klein, R., & Hubbard, L. D. (1991) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32186-9 · Cited by 1,188
Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: The Rotterdam elderly study
Albert Hofman, D., Grobbee, D. E., de Jong, P. T. V. M., & Ouweland, F. A. V. D. (1991) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/bf00145007 · Cited by 1,120
Self-citationThe Grading and Prevalence of Macular Degeneration in Chesapeake Bay Watermen
Bressler, N. M. (1989) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010869032 · Cited by 251
Age‐related macular degeneration. Macular changes, prevalence and sex ratio
Vinding, T. (1989) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb04392.x · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Leibowitz, 1980, The Framingham Eye Study monograph, Surv Ophthalmol, 24, 335
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–811 of 811
Barreto, P., Farinha, C., Coimbra, R., Cachulo, M. L., Melo, J. B., Lechanteur, Y. T. E., Hoyng, C. B., Cunha-Vaz, J. G., & Silva, R. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23949675
Rathod, S., & Tidake, P. K. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/preprints.95654
Apport de l'imagerie par OCT dans l'épidémiologie du vieillissement oculaire
Gattoussi, S. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/fe8c02afz52a2z428ez8d59z92a97bca2057
Desmettre, T. J., Ledesma‐Gil, G., & Pâques, M. (2026) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-026-07259-4
Epidemiology of retinal disease
Liu, T., Tsui, J. C., & VanderBeek, B. L. (2026) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22193-4.00009-3
Age-related macular degeneration and secondary fracture risk in patients with hip fractures
Park, M., & Kim, S. H. (2026) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113450
Amellal, Y., İnam, O., İnam, M. G., Gucer, D., Diaconita, V., & Tezel, T. H. (2026) · International Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s10792-026-04209-1
Min, H. K., Lee, B., Kim, H., Kim, L. A., & Lee, H. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-62484-5
Development of a Model for Macular Degeneration
Rakoczy, P. E., Lai, M. C., & Constable, I. J. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5933-7_9
[Rehabilitation in nursing homes--is it beneficial?].
Engedal, K. (1992) · PubMed
Metadata
- Authors
- Vingerling, J. R., Dielemans, I., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D. E., Hijmering, M., Kramer, C. F. L., & de Jong, P. T. V. M.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 205-210
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165062842
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 21.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- age-related maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, retinal pigment, atrophic macular degeneration, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, prevalence, older adults, sex differences, age-related changes
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Photography, Prospective Studies, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Retinal Drusen, Retinal Neovascularization, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review