The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity
Abstract
Background A self-rating inventory has been developed to measure DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnoses of major (moderate to severe) depression by the patients' self-reported symptoms. This Major Depression Inventory (MDI) can be scored both according to the DSM-IV and the ICD-10 algorithms for depressive symptomatology and according to severity scales by the simple total sum of the items.Methods The Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) was used as index of validity for the clinician's DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnosis of major (moderate to severe) depression. The sensitivity and specificity of MDI was assessed in a sample of 43 subjects covering a spectrum of depressive symptoms.Results The sensitivity of the MDI algorithms for major depression varied between 0.86 and 0.92. The specificity varied between 0.82 and 0.86. When using the total score of MDI the optimal cut-off score was estimated 26 and the total score was shown to be a sufficient statistic.Limitations The sample of subjects was limited. Patients with psychotic depression were not included.Conclusion The MDI was found to have a sensitivity and specificity which is acceptable. The questionnaire is brief and can be scored diagnostically by the DSM-IV and ICD-10 algorithms as well as by its simple total score.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Depression, for example, was measured using four different scales: eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) (Kroenke 2009); Major Depression Inventory (MDI) (Bech 2001); Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (Radloff 1977); and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond 1983); anxiety using three: HADS (Zigmond 1983), State-Trait Anxiety Inven”
From Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis (2023) · cites this paper as Bech 2001
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
A self-rating depression scale
ZUNG, W. W. K. (1965) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 · Cited by 9,813
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13 · Cited by 5,965
(1988) · NFER-Nelson eBooks · Cited by 5,560
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
Health Measurement Scales--A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Waclawski, E. (2010) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp179 · Cited by 1,870
A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research
Mokken, R. J. (1971) · doi:10.1515/9783110813203 · Cited by 1,120
Mental Illness in the Community: The Pathway to Psychiatric Care.
Higgins, A. C., Goldberg, D. P., & Huxley, P. J. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2068429 · Cited by 627
A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis.
Henry, N. W., & Mokken, R. J. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2062452 · Cited by 626
MENTAL ILLNESS IN THE COMMUNITY: THE PATHWAY TO PSYCHIATRIC CARE
Hannay, D. (1981) · PubMed Central · Cited by 598
Applicability and validity of the Major Depression Inventory in patients with Parkinson's disease
Bech, P., & Wermuth, L. (1998) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039489850149741 · Cited by 135
Quality of life instruments in depression
Bech, P. (1997) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(97)89104-3 · Cited by 64
Aboraya, A., Tien, A. Y., Stevenson, J., & Crosby, K. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 60
Bech, P., Stage, K. B., Nair, N. P. V., Larsen, J. K., Kragh-Sørensen, P., & Gjerris, A. (1997) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(96)00094-8 · Cited by 50
Eysenck, H. J. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90205-4 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- American Psychiatric Association, 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition (DSM-III). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
- American Psychiatric Association, 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000102 · Cited by 2,622
“…(Beck et al., 1961, 1996); DMI Depressive Mood Inventory (see Abebe et al., 2016); CDI Children’s Depression Inventory (Kovacs, 1985); MDI Major Depression Inventory (Bech et al., 2001); DTS Depressive Tendencies Scale (Alsaker et al., 1991); HDL-D Health and Daily Living Form- Depression…”
Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies
Wittchen, H.-U., & Jacobi, F. (2005) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.012 · Cited by 1,503
Stress and depression among medical students: a cross-sectional study
Dahlin, M., Joneborg, N., & Runeson, B. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x · Cited by 1,226
The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire
Pejtersen, J. H., Kristensen, T. S., Borg, V., & Bjorner, J. B. (2010) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494809349858 · Cited by 1,187
LOWE, B. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00237-9 · Cited by 1,060
Metadata
- Authors
- Bech, P., Rasmussen, N.-A., Olsen, L. R., Noerholm, V., & Abildgaard, W.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bech, P.
- ORCID
- Bech, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 159-164
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998903052
- Cited by
- 975
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Major Depression Inventory, major depressive disorder, self-report questionnaire, diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity, DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, cut-off values, depression severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review