Cited by 73Circadian rhythm and melatoninPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSleep and related disorders

Internal consistency of the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ).

Magnusson, Andres, Friis, Svein, Opjordsmoen, Stein·1997·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

We examined the consistency reliability of the widely used Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ). In total, 587 questionnaires from a random sample of the general population were analysed. The 6 items of the Seasonality Scale Index (SSI) correlated fairly well, and consequently this scale proved to have a high internal consistency (alpha = 0.82). Items from the SSI that measure seasonal variations in sleep and weight were consistent with other SPAQ scales that also measure these dimensions. Since the questionnaires analysed were from an epidemiological study, the high consistency reliability shows that the symptoms probed for by the SSI, tend to cluster in susceptible individuals in the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(96)00104-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The questionnaire has high internal consistency.

    “However, the questionnaire is retrospective to the routine seasonal changes during lifetime and has excellent sensitivity and specificity (94% and 73% respectively) for seasonal affective disorder and its subsyndromal form [62], a high internal consistency [63], and two-month test-ratest reliability [64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magnusson, A., Friis, S., & Opjordsmoen, S.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-02
Volume
42
Issue
2-3
Pages
113-116
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040456934
Cited by
73
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire, internal consistency, reliability statistics, seasonal variation, sleep, weight, general population, seasonal affective disorder, questionnaire validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Iceland, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Seasons, Reproducibility of Results, Seasonal Affective Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review