Cited by 56Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Measuring seasonality: psychometric properties of the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire and the Inventory for Seasonal Variation.

Young, Michael A, Blodgett, Christina, Reardon, Annemarie·2003·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

There is a general consensus that seasonal changes in mood, behavior and vegetative functions vary in magnitude across the general population. Studying the dimension of seasonality requires reliable and valid measures. This study examined and compared the psychometric properties of the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) and the Inventory for Seasonal Variation (ISV) in 148 college students; 73 also completed a retest 2 months later. Results indicated good psychometric properties for both scales in terms of score distributions, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factor structure and item-latent trait relationships using item response theory. Given the long history of its use and some small psychometric and simplicity advantages for the SPAQ, its continued use as a dimensional measure of seasonality is indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00299-8

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The questionnaire has two-month test-retest reliability.

    “However, the questionnaire is retrospective to the routine seasonal changes during lifetime and has excellent sensitivity and specificity (94% and 73% respectively) for seasonal affective disorder and its subsyndromal form [62], a high internal consistency [63], and two-month test-ratest reliability [64].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, M. A., Blodgett, C., & Reardon, A.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Michael A
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
75-83
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094412707
Cited by
56
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
seasonal variation, Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire, psychometric properties, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factor structure, item response theory, university students, mood, vegetative functions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Seasons, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Seasonal Affective Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review