Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 10 Subjective Time and Attentional Resource Allocation: An Integrated Model of Time Estimation

Zakay, Dan·1989·Advances in Psychology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61047-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Allan, 1979, The perception of time, Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 340, 10.3758/BF03204158 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Allan, 1976, Backward masking in judgments of duration, Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 482, 10.3758/BF03199506 · doi:10.3758/bf03199506
  3. Aschoff, 1985, On the perception of time during prolonged temporal isolation, Human Neurobiology, 4, 41
  4. Avant, 1975, Effect of stimulus familiarity upon judged visual duration, Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 253, 10.3758/BF03203208 · DOI
  5. Block, 1974, Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect, Memory and Cognition, 2, 153, 10.3758/BF03197508 · DOI
  6. Block, 1978, Remembered duration: effects of event and sequence complexity, Memory & Cognition, 6, 320, 10.3758/BF03197462 · DOI
  7. Block, 1980, A watched pot sometimes boils. A study of duration experience, Acta Psychologica, 46, 81, 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90001-3 · DOI
  8. Block, 1978, Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual change hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 656, 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.656 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.656 · Paper page
  9. R. Brandeis, (1974). The influence of number of preexposures to one stimulus and to two stimuli on the latent inhibition effect in human conditioning. Unpublished Master's Thesis: Bar Ilan University. Israel.
  10. Brown, 1985, Time perception and attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 115, 10.3758/BF03198848 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cannon, 1983, Taste familiarity and apomorphine-induced taste aversion in humans, Behavior Research and Therapy, 21, 669, 10.1016/0005-7967(83)90085-2 · DOI
  12. Clausen, 1950, An evaluation of experimental methods of time judgment, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 756, 10.1037/h0056354 · DOI
  13. Curton, 1974, Attentional focus and arousal in time estimation, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 861, 10.1037/h0037352 · doi:10.1037/h0037352
  14. Denner, 1963, Rhythmic activity and the perception of time, American Journal of Psychology, 76, 287, 10.2307/1419166 · doi:10.2307/1419166
  15. Devane, 1974, Word characteristics and judged duration for two response sequences, Perceptual & Motor Skills, 38, 525, 10.2466/pms.1974.38.2.525 · DOI
  16. Dyer, 1973, The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual cognitive and response processes, Memory and Cognition, 1, 106, 10.3758/BF03198078 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Feldman, 1982, The effect of command preexposure on instruction following behavior in severely retarded adolescents, The Psychological Records, 32, 529, 10.1007/BF03394811 · doi:10.1007/bf03394811
  18. Fraisse, 1984, Perception and estimation of time, Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1, 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ginton, 1975, The effects of preexposure to a nonattended stimulus on subsequent learning: Latent inhibition in adults, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 5, 10.3758/BF03336682 · DOI
  20. Gray, 1982, Duration differences: Attentional demand, Perception, 11, 97, 10.1068/p110097 · doi:10.1068/p110097
  21. Hicks, 1976, Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed, American Journal of Psychology, 89, 719, 10.2307/1421469 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hicks, 1977, Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing, American Journal of Psychology, 90, 431, 10.2307/1421874 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kaniel, 1986, Latent inhibition: A developmental study, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01032.x · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1986.tb01032.x
  24. Logan, 1980, Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data, Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523, 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90019-5 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Logan, 1979, When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task, Memory and Cognition, 7, 166, 10.3758/BF03197535 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lubow, 1973, Latent inhibition, Psyhological Bulletin, 79, 398, 10.1037/h0034425 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lubow, 1975, Behavioral decrement following stimulus preexposure: The effects of number of preexposure, presence of a record stimulus and interstimuli interval in children and adults, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 178, 10.1037/0097-7403.1.2.178 · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.1.2.178
  28. Lubow, 1982, Latent inhibition and learned helplessness in children: Similarities and differences, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 231, 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90044-3 · DOI
  29. Lyman, 1975, Stimulus familiarity modifies perceived duration in precognition visual processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 205
  30. Michon, 1965, Studies on subjective duration: Subjective time measurement during tasks with different information content, Acta Psychologica, 24, 205, 10.1016/0001-6918(65)90010-7 · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(65)90010-7
  31. Navon, 1979, On a conceptual hierarchy of time, space and other dimensions, Cognition, 6, 223, 10.1016/0010-0277(78)90014-8 · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90014-8
  32. Payne, 1982, Contingent decision behavior, Psychological Bulletin, 93, 382, 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382 · Paper page
  33. Poynter, 1983, Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience, Memory & Cognition, 11, 77, 10.3758/BF03197664 · doi:10.3758/bf03197664
  34. Smith, 1969, The effect on time estimation of increasing the complexity of a cognitive task, Journal of General Psychology, 81, 231, 10.1080/00221309.1969.9711288 · DOI
  35. Spence, 1966, Cognitive and drive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eyeblink in human subjects, Psychological Review, 73, 445, 10.1037/h0023638 · DOI
  36. Thomas, 1974, Time perception and the filled duration illusion, Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 449, 10.3758/BF03198571 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Thomas, 1975, Cognitive processing and time perception, Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 363, 10.3758/BF03199347 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Underwood, 1975, Attention and the perception of duration during encoding and retrieval, Perception, 4, 191, 10.1068/p040291 · doi:10.1068/p040291
  39. Vroon, 1976, Effects of presented and processed information on duration experience, Acta Psychologica, 34, 115, 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90010-7 · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(70)90010-7
  40. Wallace, 1960, Temporal experience, Psychological Bulletin, 57, 213, 10.1037/h0041410 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Zakay, 1983, The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation, Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 451, 10.3758/BF03203060 · doi:10.3758/bf03203060
  42. Zakay, 1984, Immediate and remote time estimation – A comparison, Acta Psychologica, 57, 69, 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90054-4 · DOI

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Zakay, D.
Venue
Advances in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1989
Pages
365-397
ISSN
0166-4115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1052872678
Cited by
295
References
1
FWCI
4.57
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chapter 10 Subjective Time and Attentional Resource Allocation: An Integrated Model of Time Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61047-x
The paper
Zakay, D. (1989). Chapter 10 Subjective Time and Attentional Resource Allocation: An Integrated Model of Time Estimation. Advances in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61047-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.