Cited by 464Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMulti-Criteria Decision MakingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making

Montgomery, Henry·1983·Advances in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62243-8

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People need a set of criteria for knowing when they are ready for decisions.

    “People also need a set of criteria for knowing when they are ready for decisions (Montgomery, 1983).”
  • The dominance rule is more fundamental than the other decision rules.

    “Although a variety of decision rules have been proposed for how people choose among plenty of alternatives, it is asserted that the dominance rule is more fundamental than the others (Montgomery, 1983).”
  • When the decision maker finds arguments that are strong enough for making a choice, it is proceeded by the feeling of confidence that the decision taken was the correct one to make.

    “Therefore, when the decision maker (e.g. the citing author) finds arguments that are strong enough for making a choice, it is proceeded by the feeling of confidence that the decision taken was the correct one to make (Montgomery, 1983, Vermeir et al., 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, H.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, Henry
Venue
Advances in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1983
Pages
343-369
ISSN
0166-4115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1575341967
Cited by
464
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.51
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
decision rules, dominance hierarchy, cognitive structure, pre-editing, dominance testing, choice alternatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review