Cited by 76Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingTechnology Assessment and ManagementTransportation Systems and Infrastructure

Managing the transition of technology life cycle

Kim, B.·2003·Technovation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00168-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, B.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, B.
ORCID
Kim, B.
Venue
Technovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
371-381
ISSN
0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996711859
Cited by
76
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technovation (publishedVersion)
  • KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Technology Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Transportation Systems and Infrastructure
Keywords
technology life cycle, technological change, technology generation, technology platforms, technological paradigms, switching time, technological uncertainty, switching costs, economic utility, analytical model, simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review