Cited by 419Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsQuantum Information and Cryptography

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: An experimentally accessible paradigm for quantum computing

Open access
Cory, David G., Price, Mark D., Havel, Timothy F.·1998·Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00046-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nuclear spins are particularly good quantum bits because of their natural isolation from the environment, and their use for quantum computation is possible by applying NMR techniques in an unconventional manner.

    “because of their natural isolation from the environment, nuclear spins are particularly good 'quantum bits' 16 , and their use for quantum computation is possible by applying nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques in an unconventional manner 17-19 .”

    From Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm (1998) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10][10] N. A. Gershenfeld, I. L. Chuang, and S. Lloyd. Bulk quantum computation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Physics and Computation . New England Complex Systems Institute, Boston, MA, 1996. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cory, D. G., Price, M. D., & Havel, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cory, David G.
Venue
Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
120
Issue
1-2
Pages
82-101
ISSN
0167-2789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031890195
Cited by
419
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
39.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9527181, 9357603)
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
NMR quantum computing, pseudo-pure states, quantum gates, Toffoli gate, XOR gate, entanglement, spin coherence, double resonance, double quantum coherence, quantum parallelism, NMR spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review