Cited by 316Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Bulk quantum computation with nuclear magnetic resonance: theory and experiment

Chuang, I. L., Gershenfeld, N., Kubinec, M. G., Leung, D. W.·1998·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

We show that quantum computation is possible with mixed states instead of pure states as inputs. This is performed by embedding within the mixed state a subspace that transforms like a pure state and that can be identified by labelling it based on logical (spin), temporal, or spatial degrees of freedom. This permits quantum computation to be realized with bulk ensembles far from the ground state. Experimental results are presented for quantum gates and circuits implemented with liquid nuclear magnetic resonance techniques and verified by quantum state tomography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1998.0170

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For N spins, the signal from the initial state 00...0 is proportional to n_{00...0} ∝ N Z^{-N}, where the single spin partition function Z ≈ 2 at high temperatures.

    “for N spins the signal from the initial state 00 . . . 0 is proportional to n 00 ... 0 ∝ NZ -N where the single spin partition function Z ≈ 2 at high temperatures.”

    From Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm (1998) · cites this paper as [25]

  • NMR quantum computers larger than about 10 qubits will require creative new approaches, since the signal strength decays exponentially with the number of qubits in the machine, using current schemes.

    “However, NMR quantum computers larger than about 10 qubits will require creative new approaches, since the signal strength decays exponentially with the number of qubits in the machine, using current schemes 24,25 : for N spins the signal from the initial state 00 . . . 0 is proportional to n 00 ... 0 ∝ NZ -N where the single spin partition function Z ≈ 2 at high temperatures.”

    From Experimental realization of a quantum algorithm (1998) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuang, I. L., Gershenfeld, N., Kubinec, M. G., & Leung, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
1998-01-08
Volume
454
Issue
1969
Pages
447-467
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W2100715286
Cited by
316
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
33.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
nuclear magnetic resonance, mixed states, quantum gates, quantum circuits, quantum state tomography, spin ensembles, logical qubits, spatial degrees of freedom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review