CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 84Information Technology Governance and StrategyERP Systems Implementation and ImpactTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach

Bajwa, Deepinder S, Rai, Arun, Brennan, Ian·1998·Decision Support Systems
DOI 10.1016/s0167-9236(97)00032-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-9236(97)00032-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the postimplementation stage, the presence of different types of support is very important, particularly for complex systems that are inherently difficult to understand and use.

    “In the postimplementation stage, the presence of different types of support is very important, particularly in the context of complex systems, (e.g., enterprise systems) that are inherently difficult to understand and use (e.g., Bajwa, Rai, & Brennan, 1998).”

    From Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008) · cites this paper as Bajwa, Rai, & Brennan, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bajwa, D. S., Rai, A., & Brennan, I.
Affiliations
  • Fayetteville State University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bajwa, Deepinder S
ORCID
Venue
Decision Support Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
31-43
ISSN
0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-9236(97)00032-8
OpenAlex
W2087841583
Cited by
84
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Decision Support Systems (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@Fayetteville State University (Fayetteville State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
executive information systems, top management support, IT support, executive decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review