Cited by 134Probiotics and Fermented FoodsEnzyme Production and CharacterizationPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Diversity and functionality of Bacillus and related genera isolated from spontaneously fermented soybeans (Indian Kinema) and locust beans (African Soumbala)

Open access
Sarkar, P.K, Hasenack, B, Nout, M.J.R·2002·International Journal of Food Microbiology

Abstract

A total of 126 isolates of Bacillus and related genera from indigenous, spontaneously fermented soybeans (Kinema) and locust beans (Soumbala) were characterized with the purpose of defining interspecific, as well as intraspecific relationships among the components of their microflora. B. subtilis was the dominant species, and species diversity was more pronounced in Soumbala than in Kinema. While from Kinema, six species were isolated (B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. cereus, B. circulans, B. thuringiensis and B. sphaericus), in Soumbala, the species found were B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, B. licheniformis, B. cereu, B. badius, Paenibacillus alvei, B. firmus, P. larvae, Brevibacillus laterosporus, B. megaterium, B. mycoides and B. sphaericus. Genomic diversity in the isolates of B. subtilis was investigated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The RAPD-PCR fingerprint analysis showed a high level of diversity. With more than 90% similarity, all 52 RAPD subdivisions were source and continent-wise homogeneous. Profiles of carbon source fermentation also showed a wide but corresponding phenotypic diversity, largely corresponding with RAPD subdivisions. The various strains were tested for several criteria for functionality in soybean fermentation, viz. protein degradation, pH increase, and development of desirable stickiness caused by viscous exopolymers. Profiles of functionality, based upon estimations of pH, free amino nitrogen and stickiness were associated with genotypic and phenotypic profiles. Notwithstanding the heterogenous fermentation results for some genotypic profiles, a ranking of RAPD groups is possible and can be useful in the further selection and study of B. subtilis strains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00124-1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarkar, P. K., Hasenack, B., & Nout, M. J. R.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Nout, M.J.R
Venue
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
175-186
ISSN
0168-1605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020953452
Cited by
134
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus sphaericus, Paenibacillus alvei, Paenibacillus larvae, Brevibacillus laterosporus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus badius, Bacillus circulans, soybean fermentation, cinema, RAPD-PCR, genomic diversity, protein degradation, free amino nitrogen, exopolymers
MeSH terms
Bacillus, DNA, Bacterial, Fermentation, Food Microbiology, Fabaceae, Phenotype, Glycine max, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Fingerprinting, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review