Cited by 157Parasites and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and controlParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Reducing Intestinal Nematode Infection: Efficacy of Albendazole and Mebendazole

Bennett, A, Guyatt, H·2000·Parasitology Today

Abstract

The widespread use of mebendazole and albendazole for treating intestinal nematode infections in human populations is raising concerns that careful monitoring pro- cedures should be in place to identify any emergence of drug resistance. In this article, Andy Bennett and Helen Guyatt discuss whether benchmark parasitological drug efficacy rates can be defined for these anthelmintics, by analysing published data on cure rates and egg reduction rates in the treatment of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01544-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As to T. trichiura infection, Bennett and Guyatt reviewed literature on the efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole and found that the CR of albendazole (400 mg single dose) was markedly lower in Asia than in Africa, Central and South America (33.3% vs 61.0%, respectively) probably due to a drug resistance.

    “As to T. trichiura infection, Bennett and Guyatt [336] reviewed literature on the efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole and found that the CR of albendazole (400 mg single dose) was markedly lower in Asia than in Africa, Central and South America (33.3% vs 61.0%, respectively) probably due to a drug resistance.”
  • Regarding human-infecting intestinal nematodes, such as hookworms, the emergence of drug resistance has been suggested by various workers, including Bennett and Guyatt.

    “Regarding human-infecting intestinal nematodes, such as hookworms, the emergence of drug resistance has been suggested by various workers, including Bennett and Guyatt [336].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, A., & Guyatt, H.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Parasitology Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
71-77
ISSN
0169-4758 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059686232
Cited by
155
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
intestinal nematode infection, albendazole, mebendazole, anthelmintic efficacy, drug resistance, Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, cure rate, egg reduction rate
MeSH terms
Ancylostoma, Animals, Anthelmintics, Ascariasis, Feces, Hookworm Infections, Humans, Mebendazole, Trichuriasis, Trichuris, Albendazole, Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review