Cited by 118Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesLanguage and cultural evolutionForensic and Genetic Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Untangling Oceanic settlement: the edge of the knowable

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00245-3

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Green, 1991, The Lapita cultural complex: current evidence and proposed models, Indo Pacific Prehist. Assoc. Bull., 11, 295
  2. Blust, 1999, Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics, Symp. Ser. Inst. Linguist. Acad. Sinica, 1, 31
  3. Geraghty, P. Borrowed plants in Fiji and Polynesia: some linguistic evidence. In Borrowing: A Pacific Perspective (Tent, J., and Geraghty, P., eds), Pacific Linguistics (in press).
  4. Swadesh, 1952, Lexico-statistical dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: with special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., 96, 452
  5. Parry, J.T., (1997) The North Coast of Viti Levu – Ba to Ra. Air Photo Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Bulletin of the Fiji Museum (No. 10).
  6. Hage, 1998, Was proto-Oceania society matrilineal?, J. Polynes. Soc., 107, 365
  7. Weisler, M.I., and Green, R.C., (2001) Holistic approaches to interaction studies: a Polynesian example. In Australasian Connections and New Directions (Jones, M. and Sheppard P., eds), pp. 413–447, Research in Anthropology and Linguistics No 5, University of Auckland.
  8. Matisoo-Smith, 2003, The commensal model continues – Rattus exulans mtDNA variation from Island Southeast Asia through to Polynesia, Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 31, 148
  9. Worthy, 1999, Megafaunal expression in a land without mammals – the first fossil faunas from terrestrial deposits in Fiji, Sencken. Biol., 79, 237

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 118

Metadata

Authors
Hurles, M. E., Matisoo-Smith, E., Gray, R. D., & Penny, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Allan Wilson Centre (NZ)
Corresponding author
Penny, David
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
531-540
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107341602
Cited by
118
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
Polynesian settlement, human dispersal, cultural evolution, language evolution, multidisciplinary integration, social history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review