The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Self-citationA contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 1×
“Finally, Table 5 presents intercorrelations among the two sets of scales, because some authors have expressed concern about the orthogonality of the five scales (Block, 1995).”
BackgroundMcCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456 · Cited by 499
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Brieger, 2000, The relationship between Five-Factor personality measurements and ICD-10 personality disorder dimensions, Journal of Personality disorders, 14, 282, 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.282 · DOI
- De Fruyt, 2000, Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO-PI-R, Assessment, 7, 329, 10.1177/107319110000700403 · DOI
- Egan, 2000, The NEO-FFI, Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907, 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00242-1 · DOI
- Holden, 1994, The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441, 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90291-7 · DOI
- McCrae, 1989, Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 107, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7 · DOI
- McCrae, 1997, Personality trait structure as a human universal, American Psychologist, 52, 509, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 · DOI · Paper page
- Parker, 1998, A validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments, Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1005, 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00016-6 · DOI
- Pytlik Zillig, 2002, What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive porcesses represented in Big 5 personality inventories, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847, 10.1177/0146167202289013 · DOI · Paper page
- Reise, 2000, Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO-PI-R, Assessment, 7, 347, 10.1177/107319110000700404 · DOI
- Riemann, 1997, Genetic and environmental influences on personality, Journal of Personality, 65, 449, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00324.x · DOI · Paper page
- Robins, 2001, A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood, Journal of Personality, 69, 617, 10.1111/1467-6494.694157 · DOI
- Yoshimura, 2001, Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample, Psychological Reports, 88, 443, 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.2.443 · DOI
Cited by
The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective
Van Essen, D. C., Ugurbil, K., Auerbach, E., Barch, D., Behrens, T. E. J., Bucholz, R., Chang, A., Chen, L., Corbetta, M., Curtiss, S. W., et al. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.018 · Cited by 2,680
Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior
Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., Corbetta, M., Glasser, M. F., Curtiss, S., Dixit, S., Feldt, C., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.033 · Cited by 1,529
Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795 · Cited by 927
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0019227 · Cited by 899
The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/jba.2.2013.003 · Cited by 589
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 587-596
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152472333
- Cited by
- 1,153
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00118-1
- The paper
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00118-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
