Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,153

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory

McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T.·2004·Personality and Individual Differences

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00118-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Brieger, 2000, The relationship between Five-Factor personality measurements and ICD-10 personality disorder dimensions, Journal of Personality disorders, 14, 282, 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.282 · DOI
  2. De Fruyt, 2000, Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO-PI-R, Assessment, 7, 329, 10.1177/107319110000700403 · DOI
  3. Egan, 2000, The NEO-FFI, Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907, 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00242-1 · DOI
  4. Holden, 1994, The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441, 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90291-7 · DOI
  5. McCrae, 1989, Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 107, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2401_7 · DOI
  6. McCrae, 1997, Personality trait structure as a human universal, American Psychologist, 52, 509, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Parker, 1998, A validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments, Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1005, 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00016-6 · DOI
  8. Pytlik Zillig, 2002, What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive porcesses represented in Big 5 personality inventories, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 847, 10.1177/0146167202289013 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Reise, 2000, Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO-PI-R, Assessment, 7, 347, 10.1177/107319110000700404 · DOI
  10. Riemann, 1997, Genetic and environmental influences on personality, Journal of Personality, 65, 449, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00324.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Robins, 2001, A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood, Journal of Personality, 69, 617, 10.1111/1467-6494.694157 · DOI
  12. Yoshimura, 2001, Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample, Psychological Reports, 88, 443, 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.2.443 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
587-596
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152472333
Cited by
1,153
References
3
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.