The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of infectious aerosols in health care facilities: An aid to effective engineering controls and preventive strategies
Open accessAbstract
Assessment of strategies for engineering controls for the prevention of airborne infectious disease transmission to patients and to health care and related workers requires consideration of the factors relevant to aerosol characterization. These factors include aerosol generation, particle sizes and concentrations, organism viability, infectivity and virulence, airflow and climate, and environmental sampling and analysis. The major focus on attention to engineering controls comes from recent increases in tuberculosis, particularly the multidrug-resistant varieties in the general hospital population, the severely immunocompromised, and those in at-risk and confined environments such as prisons, long-term care facilities, and shelters for the homeless. Many workers are in close contact with persons who have active, undiagnosed, or insufficiently treated tuberculosis. Additionally, patients and health care workers may be exposed to a variety of pathogenic human viruses, opportunistic fungi, and bacteria. This report therefore focuses on the nature of infectious aerosol transmission in an attempt to determine which factors can be systematically addressed to result in proven, applied engineering approaches to the control of infectious aerosols in hospital and health care facility environments. The infectious aerosols of consideration are those that are generated as particles of respirable size by both human and environmental sources and that have the capability of remaining viable and airborne for extended periods in the indoor environment. This definition precludes skin and mucous membrane exposures occurring from splashes (rather than true aerosols) of blood or body fluids containing infectious disease agents. There are no epidemiologic or laboratory studies documenting the transmission of bloodborne virus by way of aerosols. (AJIC Am J Infect Control 1998;26:453-64)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schaffer, F. L., Soergel, M. E., & Straube, D. C. (1976) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/bf01317930 · Cited by 302
RILEY, R. L., MILLS, C. C., NYKA, W., WEINSTOCK, N., STOREY, P. B., SULTAN, L. U., RILEY, M. C., & WELLS, W. F. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117542 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV
Xu, R., Cui, B., Duan, X., Zhang, P., Zhou, X., & Yuan, Q. (2020) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/s41368-020-0080-z · Cited by 394
Characterizations of particle size distribution of the droplets exhaled by sneeze
Han, Z. Y., Weng, W. G., & Huang, Q. Y. (2013) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0560 · Cited by 383
Ventilation control for airborne transmission of human exhaled bio-aerosols in buildings
Qian, H., & Zheng, X. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.01.24 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, E. C., & Cook, C. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Infection Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-464
- ISSN
- 0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982850520
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of infectious aerosols in health care facilities: An aid to effective engineering controls and preventive strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0196-6553(98)70046-x
- The paper
- Cole, E. C., & Cook, C. E. (1998). Characterization of infectious aerosols in health care facilities: An aid to effective engineering controls and preventive strategies. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-6553(98)70046-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.