The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance
Open accessAbstract
Total quality management (TQM) has been a widely applied process for improving competitiveness around the world, but with mixed success. A review of the literature revealed gaps in research in this area of quality/operations management, particularly in the area of empirical testing of the effectiveness of TQM implementation. The aim of this study was to examine the total quality management practices and operational performance of a large number of manufacturing companies in order to determine the relationships between these practices, individually and collectively, and firm performance. We used a large data base of 1200 Australian and New Zealand manufacturing organisations. The reliability and validity (construct, content, criterion) of the practice and performance measures were evaluated. Our study showed that the relationship between TQM practice and organisational performance is significant in a cross‐sectional sense, in that TQM practice intensity explains a significant proportion of variance in performance. Some but not all of the categories of TQM practice were particularly strong predictors of performance. The categories of leadership, management of people and customer focus were the strongest significant predictors of operational performance. This is consistent with literature findings that behavioural factors such as executive commitment, employee empowerment and an open culture can produce competitive advantage more strongly than TQM tools and techniques such as process improvement, benchmarking, and information and analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1016/0272-6963(94)90004-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00842.x · DOI · Paper page
- Bass B.M. 1985. Leadership and performance Free Press New York.
- Bemowski K, 1995, How do people use the Baldrige award criteria, Quality Progress, 28, 43
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00841.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/258933 · DOI · Paper page
- Debate 1992. Does the Baldrige award really work Harvard Business Review January–February pp. 126–147.
- Deming E. 1986. Out of the Crisis MIT Press Cambridge MA.
- 10.2307/41166742 · DOI
- Ergas H. Wright M. 1994. Internationalisation firm conduct and productivity. Proceedings Conference on the International Integration of the Australian Economy. Kennedy School of Government/Trade Practices Commission and Reserve Bank of Australia July.
- 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Fredrickson J.W, 1984, The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, future directions, Academy of Management Journal, 27, 445, 10.2307/256039 · DOI · Paper page
- Garvin D.A, 1991, How the Baldrige award really works, Harvard Business Review, 69, 80
- Hammer M. Champy J. 1993. Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Harper Collins New York. · DOI · Paper page
- Helton B.R, 1995, The Baldie play, Quality Progress, 28, 43
- Nunnally J. 1967. Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill New York.
- 10.1002/smj.4250160105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hfm.4530030204 · doi:10.1002/hfm.4530030204
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x · DOI · Paper page
- Stewart T.A, 1993, Reengineering: the hot new managing tool, Fortune, 23, 41
- 10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00103-9 · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(96)00103-9
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.01.005 · Cited by 2,761
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094913 · Cited by 1,457
Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective
Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00022-0 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Samson, D., & Terziovski, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-05-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-409
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2099054346
- Cited by
- 1,530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00046-1
- The paper
- Samson, D., & Terziovski, M. (1999). The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00046-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.