CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinctive activities of cognitive–behavioral therapy

Blagys, Matthew D., Hilsenroth, Mark J.·2002·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00117-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present review examined the comparative psychotherapy process literature in order to identify the distinctive activities of cognitive-behavioral (CB) treatment. Six techniques and interventions were found to distinguish CB from psychodynamic-interpersonal (PI) therapy: (1) use of homework and outside-of-session activities; (2) direction of session activity; (3) teaching of skills used by patients to cope with symptoms; (4) emphasis on patients' future experiences; (5) providing patients with information about their treatment, disorder, or symptoms; and (6) an intrapersonal/cognitive (C) focus. Identifying the distinctive features of CB therapy can improve the measurement of process-outcome correlations by more accurately specifying and operationalizing the treatment-specific processes of CB treatment, help researchers differentiate between common and treatment-specific factors, and aid in development of more psychometrically sound instruments assessing adherence and competence in CB therapy. In addition, this review can improve training of CB therapists by providing a guide for clinical practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00117-9

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Freud, 1905, On psychotherapy, vol. 7, 255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 223

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Blagys, M. D., & Hilsenroth, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Adelphi University (US)
Corresponding author
Blagys, Matthew D.
ORCID
Hilsenroth, Mark J.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
671-706
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00117-9
OpenAlex
W1794000606
Cited by
222
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, therapeutic process, psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy, homework, skills training, cognitive focus, therapist adherence, therapist competence, psychotherapy training
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Inventory, Professional-Patient Relations, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Critical Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review