CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression

Leichsenring, Falk·2001·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00057-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled This article reviews the efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in depression compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or behavioral therapy (BT). In this review, only studies in which at least 13 therapy sessions were performed have been included, and a sufficient number of patients per group were treated (N > or = 20). With regard to outcome criteria, the results were reviewed for improvements in depressive symptoms, general psychiatric symptoms, and social functioning. Six studies met the inclusion criteria.Results In 58 of the 60 comparisons (97%) performed in the six studies and their follow-ups, no significant difference could be detected between STPP and CBT/BT concerning the effects in depressive symptoms, general psychiatric symptomatology, and social functioning. Furthermore, STPP and CBT/BT did not differ significantly with regard to the patients that were judged as remitted or improved. According to a meta-analytic procedure described by R. Rosenthal (1991) the studies do not differ significantly with regard to the patients that were judged as remitted or improved after treatment with STPP or CBT/BT. The mean difference between STPP and CBT/BT concerning the number of patients that were judged as remitted or improved corresponds to a small effect size (post-assessment: phi = 0.08, follow-up assessment: phi = 0.12). Thus, STPP and CBT/BT seem to be equally effective methods in the treatment of depression. However, because of the small number of studies which met the inclusion criteria, this result can only be preliminary. Furthermore, it applies only to the specific forms of STPP that were examined in the selected studies and cannot be generalized to other forms of STPP. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of specific forms of STPP in both controlled and naturalistic settings. Furthermore, there are findings indicating that 16-20 sessions of both STPP and CBT/BT are insufficient for most patients to achieve lasting remission. Future studies should address the effects of longer treatments of depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00057-4

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Leichsenring, 1996, Zur Meta-Analyse von Grawe, Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik, 32, 205
  2. Nietzel, 1987, Clinical significance of psychotherapy for unipolar depression, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholgy, 55, 56

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Leichsenring, F.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Leichsenring, Falk
ORCID
Leichsenring, Falk
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
401-419
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00057-4
OpenAlex
W1713240235
Cited by
281
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
short-term dynamic psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavior therapy, depression, treatment efficacy, depressive symptoms, remission, social functioning, psychotherapy comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Recurrence, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review